Diagnosis of non‐strabismic binocular vision anomalies ‐ why are there so many different approaches?

Bruce Evans
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16094
2024-01-01
Acta Ophthalmologica
Abstract:Aims/Purpose: To review and contrast the main approaches for diagnosing and managing non‐strabismic binocular vision anomalies (BVA), including decompensated heterophoria, binocular instability, accommodative anomalies. Methods: A literature search was undertaken to determine the main methods of diagnosing and correcting/treating BVA. Findings from leading textbooks were compared with research literature. The literature was filtered by country and by profession to investigate factors that may contribute to diversity of approaches. Results: The literature searches reveal marked variation in the methods recommended for diagnosing BVA. There is agreement concerning the interventions available (refractive correction, prisms, eye exercises, surgery). However, there are diverse opinions concerning the criteria for determining when treatment is required. For refractive correction or prisms, the evidence suggests that different methods used for determining the correction required will lead to different prescriptions. To some extent, the variation can be attributable to national differences. However, even within some countries, very diverse diagnostic criteria and prescribing philosophies are evident. A wide variation sometimes is present within as well as between the different eyecare professions. Conclusions: Research with standardized patients indicates, clinical practice is likely to be even more varied than the review indicates. The wide variation means that even within a country/profession, a patient may consult two practitioners and receive different diagnoses, or dissimilar interventions. One reason for the variation is likely to be the historical influence of prominent clinicians/teachers. Evidence‐based scrutiny should be applied to old methods as well as new. Research is required that compares different philosophies for diagnosis and prescribing.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?