A case of posttransplant isolated extramedullary relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia achieving durable treatment-free remission with blinatumomab and donor lymphocyte infusion

Makoto Nishijima,Kentaro Ido,Yusuke Okayama,Hiroshi Okamura,Masatomo Kuno,Yosuke Makuuchi,Mitsutaka Nishimoto,Yasuhiro Nakashima,Hideo Koh,Mika Nakamae,Masayuki Hino,Hirohisa Nakamae
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-024-03839-4
2024-09-02
International Journal of Hematology
Abstract:Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has a catastrophic prognosis. Blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T cell engager, is reportedly effective for advanced B-cell ALL (B-ALL), even after allo-HCT. However, the efficacy of blinatumomab in extramedullary relapse (EMR) is controversial. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is another immunological treatment worth considering for ALL relapsed after allo-HCT. We report the case of a 56-year-old woman with B-ALL. Allo-HCT was performed during the second complete remission (CR). Thirteen months after allo-HCT, isolated EMR (iEMR) of B-ALL developed without bone marrow lesions. A third CR was achieved with 2 cycles of blinatumomab. An additional four cycles each of blinatumomab and DLI were then administered. The patient did not develop graft-versus-host disease and has confirmed 2-year treatment-free remission without a second allo-HCT. Therefore, blinatumomab was considered an effective salvage therapy for iEMR of B-ALL after allo-HCT, because iEMR could have a lower tumor burden than that seen in systemic relapse, and low tumor burden was a prognostic factor for response to blinatumomab. Furthermore, immunological consolidation therapies could only provoke graft-versus-leukemia effects if the imbalanced effector/target ratio was restored and the tumor burden was lowered through immunosurveillance.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?