Abstract:Background: Bees are confronting several environmental challenges, including the intermingled effects of malnutrition and disease. Intuitively, pollen is the healthiest nutritional choice, however, commercial substitutes, such as Bee-Pro and MegaBee, are widely used. Herein we examined how feeding natural and artificial diets shapes transcription in the abdomen of the honey bee, and how transcription shifts in combination with Nosema parasitism. Results: Gene ontology enrichment revealed that, compared with poor diet (carbohydrates [C]), bees fed pollen (P > C), Bee-Pro (B > C), and MegaBee (M > C) showed a broad upregulation of metabolic processes, especially lipids; however, pollen feeding promoted more functions, and superior proteolysis. The superiority of the pollen diet was also evident through the remarkable overexpression of vitellogenin in bees fed pollen instead of MegaBee or Bee-Pro. Upregulation of bioprocesses under carbohydrates feeding compared to pollen (C > P) provided a clear poor nutritional status, uncovering stark expression changes that were slight or absent relatively to Bee-Pro (C > B) or MegaBee (C > M). Poor diet feeding (C > P) induced starvation response genes and hippo signaling pathway, while it repressed growth through different mechanisms. Carbohydrate feeding (C > P) also elicited 'adult behavior', and developmental processes suggesting transition to foraging. Finally, it altered the 'circadian rhythm', reflecting the role of this mechanism in the adaptation to nutritional stress in mammals. Nosema-infected bees fed pollen compared to carbohydrates (PN > CN) upheld certain bioprocesses of uninfected bees (P > C). Poor nutritional status was more apparent against pollen (CN > PN) than Bee-Pro (CN > BN) or MegaBee (CN > MN). Nosema accentuated the effects of malnutrition since more starvation-response genes and stress response mechanisms were upregulated in CN > PN compared to C > P. The bioprocess 'Macromolecular complex assembly' was also enriched in CN > PN, and involved genes associated with human HIV and/or influenza, thus providing potential candidates for bee-Nosema interactions. Finally, the enzyme Duox emerged as essential for guts defense in bees, similarly to Drosophila. Conclusions: These results provide evidence of the superior nutritional status of bees fed pollen instead of artificial substitutes in terms of overall health, even in the presence of a pathogen.

Gustatory Responsiveness of Honey Bees Colonized with a Defined or Conventional Gut Microbiota

Gut microbiota contribute to variations in honey bee foraging intensity

Viral Infection Affects Sucrose Responsiveness and Homing Ability of Forager Honey Bees, Apis Mellifera L.

Immune system stimulation by the native gut microbiota of honey bees

Distinct Roles of Honeybee Gut Bacteria on Host Metabolism and Neurological Processes

Comparative Sucrose Responsiveness in Apis Mellifera and A. Cerana Foragers.

Honeybee as a food nutrition analysis model of neural development and gut microbiota

Honeybee gut Lactobacillus modulates host learning and memory behaviors via regulating tryptophan metabolism

The buzz within: the role of the gut microbiome in honeybee social behavior

The honeybee microbiota and its impact on health and disease

Lactobacillus Firm-5-derived succinate prevents honeybees from having diabetes-like symptoms

Host-derived organic acids enable gut colonization of the honey bee symbiont Snodgrassella alvi

Exploring the interactions between Nosema ceranae infection and the honey bee gut microbiome

Possible interactions between gut microbiome and division of labor in honey bees

The effect of carbohydrate sources: Sucrose, invert sugar and components of mānuka honey, on core bacteria in the digestive tract of adult honey bees (Apis mellifera)

Gut symbiont-derived anandamide promotes reward learning in honeybees by activating the endocannabinoid pathway

Changes in gut microbiota and metabolism associated with phenotypic plasticity in the honey bee Apis mellifera

Nutritive and immunological benefits derived from the honey bee gut microbiome are threatened by anthropogenic stressors

The Response of the Honey Bee Gut Microbiota to Nosema ceranae Is Modulated by the Probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici and the Neonicotinoid Thiamethoxam

The Gut Microbiota Can Provide Viral Tolerance in the Honey Bee

Transcriptional response of honey bee (Apis mellifera) to differential nutritional status and Nosema infection