Characterization and spatial distribution of microplastics in two wild captured economic freshwater fish from north and west rivers of Guangdong province

Di Sun,Jun Wang,Shaolin Xie,Huijuan Tang,Chaonan Zhang,Guohuan Xu,Jixing Zou,Aiguo Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111555
IF: 7.129
2021-01-01
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Abstract:As a new type of pollutant, microplastics are of emerging widespread concern, while amount of research done in freshwater environments and organisms is litter compared to that in marine. Following this reality, the categories of MPs in two economic freshwater fish at 25 sites from 11 cities in the north and west rivers of Guangdong province were documented. Here, 76 individuals belong Oreochromis niloticus and Cirrhinus molitorella were investigated and microplastics were found in the GITs of 43.4% and gills of 25%. The average abundances of microplastics have significant difference between Oreochromis niloticus (0.015 items/ g) and Cirrhinus molitorella (0.031 items/g), while no difference by individual (~1.9 items). The plastics were dominated by white in color (61%), fragment in shape (67%), and lass than 1 mm in size (74%). The spatial distribution of microplastics revealed that there are significant differences between different cities in average abundances, and the highest average abundances of MPs were found in Zhanjiang city (4.25 items/individual) and Guangzhou city (0.044 items/g), respectively. Our results fully proved that the microplastics was widely ingested by wild fish species and suggested that the abundance and distribution of microplastics are positively related with the development of economy, tourism, industry, agriculture, and fishery.
environmental sciences,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the diagnostic dilemma between intramural hematoma (IMH) and aortitis, which are easily confused in imaging examinations. Although these two conditions may show similar features on imaging, their pathophysiological mechanisms, treatment methods, and prognoses are completely different. Therefore, accurately distinguishing between these two diseases is crucial for clinical decision - making. ### Background Intramural hematoma (IMH) and aortitis are easily confused on imaging, but there are significant differences in their pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. This article explores how to distinguish these two diseases through imaging, laboratory tests, and medical history by using a specific case. ### Case A 54 - year - old Mexican male with no significant past medical history had an abnormal aortic contour detected on a chest X - ray during a follow - up for pneumonia. Subsequently, a chest CT showed that the wall of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and proximal descending aorta was thickened up to 2 centimeters, involving the right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex artery (LCx), and was initially diagnosed as type A intramural hematoma. The patient was urgently recalled for surgical aortic grafting within 12 hours after the CT examination. ### Clinical decision - making The patient was asymptomatic when arriving at the hospital, so continuous CT examinations were carried out to observe the progress of the disease. Laboratory test results showed negative D - dimer, and CT examination found patchy involvement of the abdominal aorta, lymph node enlargement, increased density in the venous phase, and no high - density in the non - enhanced phase. These characteristics are more in line with aortitis rather than intramural hematoma. Further detailed examinations, including screening for rheumatic diseases and infectious aortitis, only found a positive interferon - γ release assay, suggesting a potential or active tuberculosis infection. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C - reactive protein (CRP) were mildly elevated. Fine - needle aspiration biopsy of lymph nodes under endobronchial ultrasound showed no abnormalities. In order to clearly exclude intramural hematoma, an MRI "black - blood" sequence scan was performed, and the results showed obvious aortitis and surrounding inflammation. Finally, the patient received treatment for active tuberculosis and was planned to have a follow - up imaging examination in November. ### Conclusion This case emphasizes the pathophysiological mechanisms and diagnostic methods of intramural hematoma and aortitis, and how to distinguish these two diseases through imaging, laboratory tests, and medical history. The article also shows the imaging and medical history characteristics of classic intramural hematoma, Takayasu arteritis, giant - cell arteritis, bacterial and tuberculous aortitis.