Abstract:China suffers a variety of natural disasters every year. The frequency and consequences of these disasters have risen due to climate change, resulting in increased economic losses. This project first examines the existing public system of disaster relief and recovery including both direct government subsidy and public insurance system through extensive documentary study, focus group discussions and in-person interviews. We found that the usefulness of direct government subsidies is limited by the availability of public financial resources. Direct government subsidies are largely reserved for those who do not have the capability for self- relief and recovery. For those who do receive government subsidies, the amount of assistance is only sufficient for basic housing needs instead of restoring the way of life people had before a natural disaster. Public insurance, on the other hand, only applies to rural areas and has a maximum coverage of only about CNY 18,000. As with direct government subsidies, the purpose of public insurance is meeting basic needs, instead of helping people go back to the life they used to have. Furthermore, the premium of the public insurance system is heavily subsidized and not related to risk. This practice has been criticized for watering down economic incentives for proactive risk management and emergency response capacity building (Gurenko and Lester 2004; Heinz Center 2000; Yin, Kunreuther, and White 2011). The limitations of the public approach create a space for private insurance. In this paper, we investigate how China’s insurance industry (as suppliers) and Chinese people (as consumers) view natural disaster insurance. We conducted in-person interviews with insurance companies that are involved in the property insurance market in China. Insurance companies hesitate to offer insurance policy against natural disasters because of institutional barriers (e.g., natural disaster coverage is not considered a separate category, and existing accounting and tax regulations), low demand from consumers and the ambiguity associated with natural disaster. Our analysis of the demand for insurance is based on a field survey, which includes a choice- experiment of insurance selection. We found that people have a low demand for insurance because of three major reasons: a) the perception of “it won’t happen to me”, b) budgetary constraint, and c) a deep distrust in the insurance industry. We found that people tend to avoid insurance offered by small-scale insurance companies and strongly favor government insurance. This suggests that the establishment of natural disaster insurance should be initiated by government in China. We also found that one’s willingness to pay (WTP) for natural disaster insurance would significantly increase if one has high risk perception, and has experienced natural disasters. Our analyses suggest that neither the public nor private approach present an adequate solution to the challenge of financing natural disaster losses in China. Government-business collaboration may provide a viable alternative. Based on our findings, we discuss the roles that government and the private sector should play in a collaborative system.

Learning from natural disasters: Evidence from enterprise property insurance take-up in China

The Impact of Natural Disasters on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Does Historical Natural Disaster Affect Corporate Risk-Taking Nowadays? — Evidence From Yellow River Flooding In China

“Not all climate risks are alike”: Heterogeneous responses of financial firms to natural disasters in China

The Contagion and Competitive Effects Across National Borders: Evidence from the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes

Insurance Approach for Financing Extreme Climate Event Losses in China: A Status Analysis

Natural disasters and CSR: Evidence from China

Natural disasters, risk salience, and corporate ESG disclosure

Shaken to Action: Natural Disaster Experience and Enterprises' Sustainable Decision-Making

Market Implied Volatility and Natural Disasters: International Evidence

Storm Clouds over Innovation: Typhoon Shocks and Corporate R&D Activities

Natural disasters and corporate tax burden: Evidence from chinese energy sector

Effect of natural hazards on the household financial asset allocation: Empirical analysis based on CHFS2019 data

Local earthquakes and households' risk-taking: Evidence from the China Household Finance Survey

Are People Willing to Buy Natural Disaster Insurance in China? Risk Awareness, Insurance Acceptance, and Willingness to Pay

Short-term shock, long-lasting payment: Evidence from the Lushan Earthquake

Availability Heuristic and Gambler's Fallacy over Time in a Natural Disaster Insurance Choice Setting

Do natural disasters encourage bad news hoarding? Evidence from firm-level stock price crash risk

Catastrophe’s Long Reach: How Historical Natural Disasters Shape Modern Entrepreneurship?

Natural Disaster Impedes the Corporate Earnings Management in the U.S.

Typhoons and Housing Prices