Description and Climate Simulation Performance of CAS‐ESM Version 2
He Zhang,Minghua Zhang,Jiangbo Jin,Kece Fei,Duoying Ji,Chenglai Wu,Jiawen Zhu,Juanxiong He,Zhaoyang Chai,Jinbo Xie,Xiao Dong,Dongling Zhang,Xunqiang Bi,Hang Cao,Huansheng Chen,Kangjun Chen,Xueshun Chen,Xin Gao,Huiqun Hao,Jinrong Jiang,Xianghui Kong,Shigang Li,Yangchun Li,Pengfei Lin,Zhaohui Lin,Hailong Liu,Xiaohong Liu,Ying Shi,Mirong Song,Huijun Wang,Tianyi Wang,Xiaocong Wang,Zifa Wang,Ying Wei,Baodong Wu,Zhenghui Xie,Yongfu Xu,Yongqiang Yu,Liang Yuan,Qingcun Zeng,Xiaodong Zeng,Shuwen Zhao,Guangqing Zhou,Jiang Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002210
IF: 8.469
2020-12-01
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Abstract:The second version of Chinese Academy of Sciences Earth System Model (CAS‐ESM 2) is described with emphasis on the development process, strength and weakness, and climate sensitivities in simulations of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) DECK experiments. CAS‐ESM 2 was built as a numerical model to simulate both the physical climate system as well as atmospheric chemistry and carbon cycle. It is a newcomer in the international modeling community to provide sufficiently independent solutions of climate simulations from those of other models. Performances of the model in simulating the basic states of the radiation budget of the atmosphere and ocean, precipitation, circulations, variabilities, and the twentieth century warming are presented. Model biases and their possible causes are discussed. Strength includes horizontal heat transport in the atmosphere and oceans, vertical profile of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation; weakness includes the double intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and stronger amplitude of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) that are also common in many other models. The simulated the twentieth century warming shares a similar discrepancy with observations as in several other models—less warming in the 1920s and stronger cooling in the 1960s than in observation—at the time when there was a steep increase of anthropogenic aerosols. As a result, the twentieth century warming is about 60% of the observed warming despite that the model simulated a similar slope of warming trend after 1980 to observation. The model has an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 3.4 K with a positive cloud feedback from the shortwave radiation. This paper describes the second version of Chinese Academy of Sciences Earth System Model (CAS‐ESM 2) along with simulation results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) DECK experiments. Performances of the model in simulating the radiation budget of the atmosphere and ocean, precipitation, circulations, variabilities, and the twentieth century warming are presented. The simulated the twentieth century warming shares a similar discrepancy with observations as in several other models—less warming in the 1920s and stronger cooling in the 1960s than in observation—at the time when there was a steep increase of anthropogenic aerosols. As a result, the twentieth century warming is about 60% of the observed warming despite that the model simulated a similar slope of warming trend after 1980 to observation. The second version of Chinese Academy of Sciences Earth System Model (CAS‐ESM 2) is described Strength and weakness of the model simulations from the CMIP6 DECK experiments are described along possible causes The model has an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 3.4 K with a positive cloud feedback from the shortwave radiation
meteorology & atmospheric sciences