How Can We Improve Patient-Clinician Communication for Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer?
Katharina Beyer,Ailbhe Lawlor,Sebastiaan Remmers,Carla Bezuidenhout,Juan Gómez Rivas,Lionne D.F. Venderbos,Emma J. Smith,Giorgio Gandaglia,Steven MacLennan,Sara J. MacLennan,Anders Bjartell,Alberto Briganti,Philip Cornford,Susan Evans-Axelsson,Maria J. Ribal,James N'Dow,Erik Briers,Monique J. Roobol,Mieke Van Hemelrijck,for the PIONEER Consortium
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.011
IF: 3
2024-04-01
European Urology Open Science
Abstract:Background and objective The ability of health care professionals to communicate with patients compassionately and effectively is crucial for shared decision-making, but little research has investigated patient-clinician communication. As part of PIONEER—an international Big Data Consortium led by the European Association of Urology to answer key questions for men with prostate cancer (PCa), funded through the IMI2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 777492— we investigated communication between men diagnosed with PCa and the health care professional(s) treating them across Europe. Methods We used the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Communication 26, which was shared via the PIONEER and patient organisations on March 11, 2022. We sought men who spoke French, Italian, Spanish, German, Dutch, or English who were diagnosed with PCa and were undergoing or had already received treatment for their PCa. Results and limitations A total of 372 men reported that they communicated with their clinician during either the diagnostic or the treatment period. Overall, the majority of participants reported positive experiences. However, important opportunities to enhance communication were identified, particularly with regard to correcting misunderstandings, understanding the patient’s preferred approach to information presentation, addressing challenging questions, supporting the patient’s comprehension of information, attending to the patient’s emotional needs, and assessing what information had already been given to patients about their disease and treatment, and how much of it was understood. Conclusions and clinical implications These results help us to identify gaps and barriers to shared treatment decision making. This knowledge will help devise measures to improve patient-health care professional communication in the PCa setting. Patient As part of the PIONEER initiative, we investigated the communication between men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their health care professionals across Europe. A total of 372 men from six different countries participated in the study. Most participants reported positive experiences, but areas where communication could be improved were identified. These included addressing misunderstandings, tailoring the presentation of information to the patient’s preferences, handling difficult questions, supporting emotional needs, and assessing the patient’s understanding of their diagnosis and treatment.
urology & nephrology