Abstract:Current Status of Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Report of a Workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers, Martinsried, March 3, 2023 We read with interest the report from Schmoeckel et al regarding the March 3, 2023 Workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers.[1] Within the report, Schmoeckel et al mention the ethical requirement that xenotransplantation offer recipients a favorable risk–benefit outcome. To our surprise, they write "a heart [xenotransplantation] can be expected to have a rather large benefit with sufficient certainty for patients in terminal heart failure" and that xenozoonotic transmission "does not appear to represent an obstacle from an ethical perspective." Our concern is that, in light of the two recent cardiac xenotransplantations, the risk–benefit analysis remains contested and not so clearly favorable. First, the initial cardiac xenograft recipient in early 2022, Mr. Bennett, died 60 days post-transplant and had acquired a porcine cytomegalovirus from the graft, which may have contributed to the graft's failure.[2] The second cardiac xenograft recipient, Mr. Faucette, died just shy of 6 weeks post-transplant and the cause of his death has yet to be announced, though the heart showed signs of rejection. In short, the conclusiveness of heart xenotransplantation being "expected to have a rather large benefit with sufficient certainty for patients in terminal heart failure" seems far from a foregone conclusion. While we remain hopeful that one day cardiac xenotransplantation will indeed be a viable clinical alternative to allotransplantation, presenting "sufficient certainty" for patients in need, this still seems to be a way off. Even should formal clinical trials begin soon, clinical equipoise will not exist for some time. Second, the authors state that, "With appropriate sensitive screening for xenogeneic infections, the potential harm for third parties, hospital staff and close relatives, does not appear to represent an obstacle from an ethical perspective." Screening for xenogeneic infections requires the availability and reliability of sensitive microbiologic assays, some of which are available and others are not.[3] Yet, an ethical issue that has received scant attention in the literature is risk to third parties or so-called bystanders. Not only are appropriate screening measures needed but also education of persons who are plausibly at heightened risk of acquiring a novel xenozoonosis from the xenograft recipient due to proximity and frequency of contact is required. This could be family members, sexual partners, caregivers, and many others. Screening for infectious disease in the xenograft recipient may be straightforward if bio-surveillance is mandated (though this in itself is controversial), yet it is not so direct for bystanders. Thoughtful consideration must be given on how to educate bystanders and how screening for xenozoonosis might be accomplished should infection be suspected, followed by necessary quarantine should infection be confirmed. The ethical matters, then, are far more complex than the authors lead on. While we remain optimistic about the future of xenotransplantation, a more matter-of-fact analysis of the current situation is needed in light of the fact that in the only two genetically modified porcine heart-to-human transplantations that have been conducted, the patients rapidly declined under uncertain circumstances. Received: 03 January 2024 Accepted: 09 January 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 10 January 2024 Article published online: 13 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Xenotransplantation in the Age of Genome Editing: Results From the Expert Report for the Federal Ethics Committee on Nonhuman Biotechnology With a Special Focus on Animal Ethics

Ethical Implications of Social Science Research on Xenotransplantation

Update on the ethical, legal and technical challenges of translating xenotransplantation

Unaddressed regulatory issues in xenotransplantation: a hypothetical example

Xenotransplantation: A historical-ethical account of viewpoints

Xenotransplantation Literature Update December 2023–June 2024

Ethical and legislative advances in xenotransplantation for clinical translation: focusing on cardiac, kidney and islet cell xenotransplantation

Ethical considerations in xenotransplantation of thoracic organs – a call for a debate on value based decisions

Current challenges in xenotransplantation

Opinions on the Future of Clinical Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation literature update, November/December 2019

Xenotransplantation: A New Era

Ethical analysis of the first porcine cardiac xenotransplantation

"Xenotransplantation challenges us as a society": What well-informed citizens think about xenotransplantation

The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature

107.4: International Human Xenotransplantation Inventory: A 12-Year Follow-Up

Does Xenotransplantation Offer a Large Benefit for Human Patients?

Xenotransplantation in transition

Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the future

Xenotransplantation literature update March 2023–November 2023

Ethical issues of xenotransplantation in the aspect of religious views