Ecological study measuring the association between conflict, environmental factors, and annual global cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis incidence (2005–2022)
Maia C. Tarnas,Aula Abbara,Angel N. Desai,Daniel M. Parker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012549
2024-09-27
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Abstract:Cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (CL/ML) cause significant morbidity globally and are vulnerable to changes from environmental events and conflict. In this ecological study, we aim to measure the associations between annual CL/ML cases, conflict intensity, and environmental factors between 2005 and 2022 globally. We pulled annual case data from the WHO for 52 nations that had conflict intensity scores (ranging from 1–10) from the Bertelsmann Transformation Index. Using Earth observation tools, we gathered temperature, precipitation, vegetation, and humidity data, in addition to data on annual estimates of population, internal displacement, and GDP. We fit a negative binomial generalized additive model with a random nation-level intercept. Conflict was positively associated with increased CL/ML across the studied nations (IRR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.16, p = 0.02). Given this, intense conflict (a score of ten) was associated with over double the risk of CL/ML compared to the lowest conflict levels (score of one). We also identified a curvilinear relationship between mean temperature and cases, as well as between vegetation level and cases. Each had small pockets of significant increased and decreased risk, respectively. Larger mean humidity ranges were negatively associated with cases. Importantly, the relationship between conflict intensity and cases was mediated by displacement. Conflict is significantly associated with increased CL/ML cases. This is especially true at higher conflict levels, marking when conflict turns violent. The destruction of critical infrastructure (e.g., that related to healthcare, water, and sanitation) often seen during conflict could drive this association. Such environments can be hospitable to sandflies and can heighten individuals' vulnerability through increased malnutrition, poverty, and displacement. Understanding this relationship is crucial for public health preparedness and response, especially as conflicts become increasingly violent and protracted. Cases of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, spread through sandflies infected with a Leishmania protozoan parasite, have risen in the past several decades. Though rarely fatal, cutaneous leishmaniasis causes highly stigmatizing skin lesions, and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis can destroy mucous membranes of the nose, mouth, and throat. Leishmaniasis is frequently found in areas with high levels of poverty, infrastructure destruction (e.g., of healthcare and water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities), displacement, and poor living conditions. Conflicts often create environments that are hospitable to leishmaniasis emergence, re-emergence, and transmission. Environmental factors, like temperature and precipitation, can also affect leishmaniasis incidence through impacts on the sandfly vector and on humans' proximity to the vector. In our ecological study, we measured the association between conflict and leishmaniasis over 18 years while accounting for other factors, such as environmental conditions and population displacement, that are relevant to leishmaniasis' spread. We found that conflict was significantly associated with increased risk of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis across the 52 included nations. Population displacement played an important role in the relationship between conflict and leishmaniasis incidence. This work is important for understanding global drivers of the increasing leishmaniasis burden in order to enhance preparedness efforts.
tropical medicine,parasitology