A Critical Review and Benchmark Study of Dependency Modeling for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment in the Nuclear Power Industry

Taotao Zhou,Laibin Zhang,Jinqiu Hu,Mohammad Modarres,Enrique Lopez Droguett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110009
IF: 7.247
2024-02-10
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Abstract:The risk significance of seismic dependencies has received growing attention from the nuclear power industry, particularly following the Fukushima disaster in 2011. As a result, many efforts have been devoted to dependency modeling for seismic probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) of nuclear power plants. However, there is still no consensus on a unified method for seismic dependency modeling. This paper aims to review and benchmark the state-of-the-art methods for seismic dependency modeling. This is accomplished by investigating an asymmetric system consisting of three safety-related components. Notably, we illustrate the application of four leading dependency modeling methods: full Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), Bayesian network, Reed-McCann, and COREX methods. The paper compares and contrasts these methods' performance from three perspectives: the precision of estimates within analytical lower and upper bounds; the proper differentiation between independent and dependent scenarios; and the degree of conservatism in dealing with parallel systems. The results show that the Reed-McCann method has issues in quantifying the effect of seismic dependencies and provides considerable conservatism; the Bayesian network-based method performs poorly and underestimates risk; the COREX method performs satisfactorily to quantify seismic dependencies with acceptable conservatism and potentially offers a balance between accuracy and scalability in large-scale seismic PRA.
engineering, industrial,operations research & management science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?