National-level environmental perceptions and walking among urban and rural residents: Informing surveillance of walkability

Geoffrey P Whitfield,Susan A Carlson,Emily N Ussery,Kathleen B Watson,David Berrigan,Janet E Fulton,Geoffrey P. Whitfield,Susan A. Carlson,Emily N. Ussery,Kathleen B. Watson,Janet E. Fulton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.019

IF: 5.1

2019-06-01

Preventive Medicine

Abstract:Built environments that provide activity-friendly routes (e.g., sidewalks) to everyday destinations (e.g., shops) can increase physical activity. Surveillance of supports and destinations is important, and identifying which are associated with walking could prioritize surveillance questions. Our purpose was to identify the significant associations between supports and destinations with walking among a nationally-representative sample of urban- and rural-dwelling adults. Participants in the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, Cancer Control Supplement (n = 29,925) reported the near-home presence of walkable supports (roads, sidewalks, paths, or trails; sidewalks on most streets), destinations (shops; transit; movies, libraries, or churches; relaxing places), and past-week walking for leisure or transportation. We used stepwise logistic regression to quantify associations between supports and destinations and walking, including by urban/rural residence. We calculated the prevalence of walking across counts of reported elements by urban/rural residence. Among all participants, roads, sidewalks, paths, or trails and relaxing destinations were associated with leisure walking. Among urban residents, sidewalks on most streets and all four destination types were associated with transportation walking; among rural residents, roads, sidewalks, paths, or trails; movies, libraries, or churches; and relaxing destinations were associated with transportation walking. Walking was more common when more environmental elements were reported. To improve efficiency, communities may match surveillance priorities to behavioral priorities (i.e., leisure versus transportation walking) and environmental context (i.e., urban/rural areas). Surveillance of environments supporting leisure walking might focus on recreation-oriented spaces. Surveillance of environments supporting transportation walking might differ for urban and rural areas, and assessing destinations may be particularly important.

medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health