Net CO2 and CH4 emissions from restored mangrove wetland: New insights based on a case study in estuary of the Pearl River, China

Xiaosong Zhao,Chunlin Wang,Tingting Li,Chengyi Zhang,Xingwang Fan,Qing Zhang,Qiang Zhang,Xianyan Chen,Xukai Zou,Chong Shen,Yuqi Tang,Zhangcai Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151619
2022-03-01
Abstract:Mangroves have the potential to affect climate via C sequestration and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. With half of the world's mangroves lost during the 20th century, mangrove restoration in mitigating greenhouse gases has been increasingly recognized. However, the carbon exchanges during restored processes still remain large uncertain. In this study, we analyzed the temporal variations of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes and their environmental controls during 2019 and 2020 based on a closed-path eddy covariance (EC) system in a 12-year restored subtropical mangrove wetland, in estuary of the Pearl River, southeastern China. We also estimated the CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes and their climate effect from the beginning of restoration by Random Forest algorithm (RF). The EC observations showed that annually the 12-year restored mangrove acted as CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> sources, with net CO<sub>2</sub> ecosystem exchange (NEE) of 82-175 gC·m<sup>- 2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes of 24.7-26.3 gC·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>. Low vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP) and high ecosystem respiration (Re) caused net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the mangroves. The estimation by RF indicated that the mangroves were always a CO<sub>2</sub> source after the beginning of restoration, but the annual NEE was linearly decreased from 233 to 131 gC·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> from 2008 to 2020. The annual CH<sub>4</sub> emissions continually increased from 19.0 to 25.8 gC·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> after restoration. As a result, the restored mangrove had a positive effect on climate warming, with increased GWP from 1276 to 1386 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> from 2008 to 2020. This is mainly due to lower GPP and higher Re by young restored mangroves, large water area as well as low salinity induced strong CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Our results indicate new sights that young restored mangrove with large area of water surface may act as carbon sources. However, the long-term climate and ecosystem benefits due to mangrove restoration should not be ignored in future.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?