Abstract:Environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) scores have been widely touted as indicators of share price resilience during the COVID-19 humanitarian crisis. We undertake extensive analyses to investigate this claim and present robust evidence that, once the firm’s industry affiliation and accounting- and market-based measures of risk have been properly controlled for, ESG scores offer no such positive explanatory power for returns during COVID-19. Specifically, ESG is insignificant in fully specified returns regressions for the first quarter of 2020 COVID crisis period, and it is weakly negatively associated with returns during the market’s “recovery” period in the second quarter of 2020. Industry affiliation, market-based measures of risk, and accounting-based variables that capture the firm’s financial flexibility (liquidity and leverage) and their investments in internally-developed intangible assets together dominate the explanatory power of the COVID returns models. Relying on data from the global financial crisis (“GFC”) of 2008-2009, we develop parsimonious logit-based models to explain GFC period “winners” and “losers” (i.e., top and bottom deciles of returns performance), and we use these fitted models to predict winners and losers in the subsequent COVID crisis. Employing receiver operating characteristic (“ROC”) curves, we demonstrate that various accounting- and market-based models perform well both within-sample for the GFC period, as well as out-of-sample for the COVID crisis, but that ESG does not meaningfully add to the combined accounting and market models’ performance. We develop hedge strategies that go long (short) in firms during the COVID crisis that the GFC-based models predict will be winners (losers) and document that these predictions yield highly significant abnormal returns. Once again, ESG offers no enhancement to the out-of-sample returns performance. We conclude that celebrations of ESG as an important resilience factor in times of crisis are, at best, premature.

Voting in the Stock Market–Retail Investor Preferences During COVID‐19

Do Robinhood investors care about ESG?

ESG Didn’t Immunize Stocks Against the Covid-19 Market Crash

ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did

The Irrelevance of ESG Disclosure to Retail Investors: Evidence from Robinhood

Do retail investors gamble more during lockdown?

The Impact of ESG Scores on Risk Market Performance

Do Retail Investors Trade on ESG?

Retail Investors and ESG News

Resiliency of Environmental and Social Stocks: An Analysis of the Exogenous COVID-19 Market Crash

Does sustainability activities performance matter during financial crises? Investigating the case of COVID-19

Portfolio performance implications of investment in renewable energy equities: Green versus gray

Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Performance of Corporate Value in Different Periods

The Value Effect of ESG Ratings during the COVID-19 - Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-Share Market

Inside the Mind of Investors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the StockTwits Data

Where Do Institutional Investors Seek Shelter when Disaster Strikes? Evidence from COVID-19

Shareholder Voting and COVID-19: The China Experience

Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis

On the Resilience of US ESG Stocks: Evidences from the COVID-19 Market Crashes

A Green Wave in Media: A Change of Tack in Stock Markets

Environmental, social, governance (ESG) & sustainable finance : Emergence of new era of investing