Abstract:Background Recent studies have shown that, owning to its cohesive cleavage, Cas9-mediated CRISPR gene editing outcomes at junctions of chromosomal rearrangements or DNA-fragment editing are precise and predictable; however, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood due to lack of suitable assay system and analysis tool.Results Here we developed a customized computer program to take account of staggered or cohesive Cas9 cleavage and to rapidly process large volumes of junctional sequencing reads from chromosomal rearrangements or DNA-fragment editing, including DNA-fragment inversions, duplications, and deletions. We also established a sensitive assay system using HPRT1 and DCK as reporters for cell growth during DNA-fragment editing by Cas9 with dual sgRNAs and found prominent large resections or long deletions at junctions of chromosomal rearrangements. In addition, we found that knockdown of PolQ (encoding Pol theta polymerase), which has a prominent role in theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ) or microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), results in increased large resections but decreased small deletions. We also found that the mechanisms for generating small deletions of 1bp and >1bp during DNA-fragment editing are different with regard to their opposite dependencies on Pol theta and Pol lambda (encoded by the PolL gene). Specifically, Pol theta suppresses 1bp deletions but promotes >1bp deletions, whereas Pol lambda promotes 1bp deletions but suppresses >1bp deletions. Finally, we found that Pol lambda is the main DNA polymerase responsible for fill-in of the 5 ' overhangs of staggered Cas9 cleavage ends.Conclusions These findings contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA-fragment editing and have important implications for controllable, precise, and predictable gene editing.

Simulation of CRISPR-Cas9 editing on evolving barcode and accuracy of lineage tracing

Quantitative Analysis of Synthetic Cell Lineage Tracing Using Nuclease Barcoding

A Comprehensive Evaluation of CRISPR Lineage Recorders Using TraceQC

Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing

Cell lineage tracing using nuclease barcoding

Estimation of cell lineage trees by maximum-likelihood phylogenetics

Single-cell lineage tracing by integrating CRISPR-Cas9 mutations with transcriptomic data

Target Binding and Residence: a New Determinant of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice in CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

Charting Single Cell Lineage Dynamics and Mutation Networks via Homing CRISPR

Genome Editing by Dual Nucleases Records Deep Lineage Hierarchy with High Fidelity

Using CRISPR barcoding as a molecular clock to capture dynamic processes at single-cell resolution

Machine-learning-optimized Cas12a barcoding enables the recovery of single-cell lineages and transcriptional profiles

Large-scale reconstruction of cell lineages using single-cell readout of transcriptomes and CRISPR–Cas9 barcodes by scGESTALT

LinRace: cell division history reconstruction of single cells using paired lineage barcode and gene expression data

Decoding the Complexity of On-Target Integration: Characterizing DNA Insertions at the CRISPR-Cas9 Targeted Locus Using Nanopore Sequencing

Developmental progression of DNA double-strand break repair deciphered by a single-allele resolution mutation classifier

Defining Endogenous Barcoding Sites for CRISPR/Cas9-based Cell Lineage Tracing in Zebrafish

Precise measurement of molecular phenotypes with barcode-based CRISPRi systems

DNA Polymerases in Precise and Predictable CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Chromosomal Rearrangements

Global Detection of DNA Repair Outcomes Induced by CRISPR-Cas9

Linking CRISPR–Cas9 double-strand break profiles to gene editing precision with BreakTag