Abstract:Background: Reaping the benefits from massive volumes of data collected in all sectors to improve population health, inform personalized medicine, and transform biomedical research requires the delicate balance between the benefits and risks of using individual-level data. There is a patchwork of US data protection laws that vary depending on the type of data, who is using it, and their intended purpose. Differences in these laws challenge big data projects using data from different sources. The decisions to permit or restrict data uses are determined by elected officials; therefore, constituent input is critical to finding the right balance between individual privacy and public benefits. Objective: This study explores the US public's preferences for using identifiable data for different purposes without their consent. Methods: We measured data use preferences of a nationally representative sample of 504 US adults by conducting a web-based survey in February 2020. The survey used a choice-based conjoint analysis. We selected choice-based conjoint attributes and levels based on 5 US data protection laws (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, Privacy Act of 1974, Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Common Rule). There were 72 different combinations of attribute levels, representing different data use scenarios. Participants were given 12 pairs of data use scenarios and were asked to choose the scenario they were the most comfortable with. We then simulated the population preferences by using the hierarchical Bayes regression model using the ChoiceModelR package in R. Results: Participants strongly preferred data reuse for public health and research than for profit-driven, marketing, or crime-detection activities. Participants also strongly preferred data use by universities or nonprofit organizations over data use by businesses and governments. Participants were fairly indifferent about the different types of data used (health, education, government, or economic data). Conclusions: Our results show a notable incongruence between public preferences and current US data protection laws. Our findings appear to show that the US public favors data uses promoting social benefits over those promoting individual or organizational interests. This study provides strong support for continued efforts to provide safe access to useful data sets for research and public health. Policy makers should consider more robust public health and research data use exceptions to align laws with public preferences. In addition, policy makers who revise laws to enable data use for research and public health should consider more comprehensive protection mechanisms, including transparent use of data and accountability.

Government Data of the People, by the People, for the People: Navigating Citizen Privacy Concerns

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

Data Profiteering: Corporate Social Responsibility and Privacy Law Lost in Data Monetization and National Security

US Privacy Laws Go Against Public Preferences and Impede Public Health and Research: Survey Study

A Human-Centered Approach to Data Privacy : Political Economy, Power, and Collective Data Subjects

SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality

A Roadmap for Greater Public Use of Privacy-Sensitive Government Data: Workshop Report

Public Goods From Private Data -- An Efficacy and Justification Paradox for Digital Contact Tracing

Insights from an experiment crowdsourcing data from thousands of US Amazon users: The importance of transparency, money, and data use

Government Access to Privately-Held Data: Business-to-Government Data Sharing

Balancing data privacy and usability in the federal statistical system

Data Governance and Stewardship: Designing Data Stewardship Entities and Advancing Data Access

Privacy in computer ethics: Navigating the digital age

Big Data: Opportunities and Privacy Challenges

Human-GDPR Interaction: Practical Experiences of Accessing Personal Data

Individual privacy versus public good: protecting confidentiality in health research

Digital Privacy Rights in the Age of Big Data: Balancing Security and Civil Liberties

Optional Data Disclosure and the Online Privacy Paradox: A UK Perspective

Privacy Risks from Public Data Sources

Privacy Harm and Non-Compliance from a Legal Perspective

Privacy-Preserving Data Analysis for the Federal Statistical Agencies