Abstract:Background Nonsurgical cosmetic procedures, particularly the use of hyaluronic acid (HA)‐based soft tissue fillers, are becoming increasingly popular. This trend has catalyzed the development of a plethora of HA‐based products differing in product characteristics, thereby catering to an ever‐widening spectrum of aesthetic applications. However, complications rise concomitant with the increasing number of procedures. Among the strategies to manage such adverse events is the enzymatic breakdown with hyaluronidase. Objective To analyze the response of different HA‐based soft tissue filler materials to hyaluronidase injections. Methods A total of 11 different HA‐based soft tissue fillers were evaluated using noninvasive ultrasound imaging to assess their behavior in response to hyaluronidase injections. The HA‐based soft tissue fillers were categorized according to their product characteristics into a structuring, volumizing, and lip volumizing group. Standardized injections of 0.2 cc were performed in chicken breast to simulate human tissue. Ultrasound measurements of width, height, and calculated volume were performed immediately after filler injection, 1 h and 24 h following hyaluronidase injection. Results Regardless of the soft tissue filler analyzed, the most significant volume reduction occurred within the first h after applying hyaluronidase, with a 64.1% decrease from the initial volume. After 24 h, the total volume reduction reached 81.7%. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the three groups at each follow‐up time period, except for the height measurement after 1 h. While width was statistically significant in all groups between the investigated follow‐up groups, the volume reduction was only statistically significant in the groups with the highest and second highest G' values (i.e., Group 1—structuring, Group 2—volumizing). Conclusion The effectiveness of hyaluronidase in dissolving HA‐based fillers is initially independent of product characteristics of HA‐based fillers such as G‐prime, with increased efficacy in fillers with higher G‐prime values, as evidenced by significant volume reductions in such groups.

Warm Water Soaking Followed by the Back-and-Forth Pushing: An Easy Reconstitution Method for Eliminating Micro-aggregates in AestheFill Suspension

The Differences Between Sculptra and AestheFill Reconstitution Processes

A Personalized Protocol for Facial Rejuvenation Using Two Soft Hyaluronic Acid Fillers With High Cohesivity

Injectable fillers: review of material and properties

Simplifying the injector's armamentarium: An international consensus regarding the use of gel science to differentiate hyaluronic acid fillers and guide treatment recommendations

Synthesis and Properties of Injectable Hydrogel for Tissue Filling

Permanent Facial Fillers: Addressing Complications and Advancing Solutions

Development of Dispersion Process to Improve Quality of Hyaluronic Acid Filler Crosslinked with 1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether

The rheology of injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels used as facial fillers: A review

Resolve and dissolve—An ultrasound‐guided investigation on the effects of hyaluronidase on different soft tissue fillers

A new nonhydrophilic agarose gel as subdermal filler for facial rejuvenation: Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction

Surgery for Foreign Body Reactions due to Injectable Fillers

Injectable soft-tissue fillers: clinical overview

Investigating the Relationship Between the Emulsification Parameters and Physical–Chemical Properties of Poly(D,L-lactic acid) Particles for Dermal Fillers

The Intrinsic Relation between the Hydrogel Structure and In Vivo Performance of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Comparative Study of Four Typical Dermal Fillers

Response of 21 Hyaluronic Acid Fillers to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase

Hyaluronic Acid After Subcutaneous Injection—An Objective Assessment

Methods About Swelling, Recovery and Preservation of Sephadex in Gel Filtration Chromatography

Intracorporeal evaluation of hyaluronic acid fillers with varied rheological properties and correlations with aesthetic outcomes

Investigation of Crosslinking Parameters and Characterization of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: From Design to Product Performances

High-temperature emulsification coupled with low-temperature gelation for fabrication of agarose microsphere implants with well-controlled size for skin tissue enhancement