Comparing Torque Transmission of Different Bracket Systems in Combination with Various Archwires Considering Play in the Bracket Slot: An In Vitro Study

Andrea Wichelhaus,Simon Guggenbühl,Linus Hötzel,Corinna L. Seidel,Hisham Sabbagh,Lea Hoffmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17030684

IF: 3.4

2024-02-01

Materials

Abstract:This study aims to examine the play between various archwires and bracket systems, exploring potential variations in angle values for specific torque and torque values for a given angle along different bracket systems. Therefore, seven brackets systems were evaluated in conjunction with different stainless steel archwires of varying dimensions (0.016′′ × 0.022′′, 0.018′′ × 0.025′′, and 0.019′′ × 0.025′′). Biomechanical behavior during torque development and transmission was assessed using a six-component force/torque sensor. Torque angles (5–45°) were specified with subsequent torque measurement, and the sequence was reversed by setting the torque (5–30 Nmm) and measuring the angle. A reference measurement with 0 Nmm torque served to evaluate bracket slot play. Bracket play (0 Nmm) during palatal load ranged between 20.06° and 32.50° for 0.016′′ × 0.022′′ wire, 12.83° and 21.11° for 0.018′′ × 0.025′′ wire, and 8.39° and 18.73° for 0.019′′ × 0.025′′ wire. The BioQuick® bracket exhibited the highest play, while Wave SL® and Damon® Q brackets demonstrated the lowest play (p < 0.001). Significant differences (p < 0.001) between the brackets were observed in the torque angles required to achieve torques of 5–20 Nmm. In summary, each bracket system has a different torque transmission, which is of great clinical importance in order to achieve correct torque transmission and avoid complications such as root resorption.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering