Comment on “Binding Debye–Hückel theory for associative electrolyte solutions” [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 154503 (2023)]

Jean-Pierre Simonin,Olivier Bernard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0189173
IF: 4.304
2024-08-02
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Abstract:It is argued that the Binding Debye–Hückel (BiDH) model proposed by Naseri Boroujeni et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 154503 (2023)] might not be appropriate for the description of Monte Carlo simulation data obtained for primitive model electrolytes. The first reason is that the original Debye–Hückel (DH) theory is of low accuracy for describing deviations from ideality in concentrated solutions of strong salts. The DH framework is thus a poor basis for building a model including association. The second reason is that the mean-spherical approximation, without assumption of association, apparently predicts Monte Carlo (MC) data for primitive electrolytes better than BiDH. Thus, the BiDH model seems to be simply a way of compensating for the deficiencies of DH theory by assuming association.
chemistry, physical,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?