Abstract:The ever-increasing need for coral restoration as a tool available to mitigate reef declines and aid in the recovery of lost ecosystem services requires improving restoration performance over time through an adaptive management framework to evaluate the status of restoration programs using uniform, consistent metrics. An evaluation tool, presented herein, allows restoration practitioners and managers to self-evaluate the robustness of each project and identify successful metrics, those metrics that need special attention, and changes to restoration strategies that can improve performance and aid recovery. This tool is designed to allow programs to track the progress of each key metric over time to assist in improving upon successes and learning from failures. The metrics within this restoration evaluation tool focus on published best-management practices and have resulted from extensive research conducted by restoration experts over the past 20 years. Common metrics of growth and survival are included, in addition to parameters vital to the operational success of restoration programs, such as coral reproduction, recruitment of associated reef taxa, increasing habitat for reef fisheries, and improving overall reef habitat. Five Caribbean restoration programs, each with at least 15 years of restoration experience, are presented as case studies. Each program was evaluated based on six restoration categories including: field-based nurseries, outplantings, programmatic management, education and outreach, event-driven restoration, and socioeconomic restoration. Category-specific metrics were scored with a binary scoring system and summarized using a stop-light indicator framework, where the resulting color/score indicates the operations tatus of the different program components (Scores >75% = green/successful; 50–74.9% = light green > yellow > orange/intermediate; 75% indicating most of these programs are performing well, are versatile, well managed, and sustainable. Outside of environmental factors and large-scale disturbance events, many programs described resource limitations, including funding and staffing, as reasons for scoring low on some metrics. A holistic evaluation rubric incorporated into programmatic self-assessment can ensure that restoration projects and programs are working towards success and sustainability.

Identifying coral reef restoration objectives: A framework

An integrative framework for sustainable coral reef restoration

Including environmental and climatic considerations for sustainable coral reef restoration

Perspectives on the Use of Coral Reef Restoration as a Strategy to Support and Improve Reef Ecosystem Services

Interventions to help coral reefs under global change—A complex decision challenge

Applying the SES Framework to coral reef restoration projects on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica

An evaluation tool for assessing coral restoration efforts

Coral restoration – A systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions

Aligning social and ecological goals for successful marine restoration

Identifying restoration hotspots that deliver multiple ecological benefits

The critical role of coral reef restoration in a changing world

Selecting Heat-Tolerant Corals for Proactive Reef Restoration

How the incentives of participating organizations influence the current scales of coral reef restoration activities

Motivations, success, and cost of coral reef restoration

Assessing Indicators and Limitations of Food Security Objectives in Coral Reef Restoration

Multi-dimensional approaches to scaling up coral reef restoration

Roadmap for improving coral reef restoration practices in Southeast Asia

Coral restoration: a mapping review through a scientometric analysis

Scaling Up Coral Reef Restoration Using Remote Sensing Technology

Institutional dimensions of coral reef restoration in the Philippines

Social–environmental drivers inform strategic management of coral reefs in the Anthropocene