Application of Real-Time Augmented Reality Laparoscopic Navigation in Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly

Hai-Su Tao,Jin-Yu Lin,Wang Luo,Rui Chen,Wen Zhu,Chi-Hua Fang,Jian Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06082-8
IF: 3.282
2021-03-26
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical impact and technical feasibility of augmented reality laparoscopic navigation (ARLN) system in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.MethodsThe clinical data of 17 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy using ARLN (ARLN group) and 26 patients without ARLN guidance (Non-ARLN group) between January 2018 and April 2020 were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed between the patients with and without ARLN guidance at a ratio of 1:1.ResultsMean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the ARLN-group than in the Non-ARLN group (306.6 ml vs. 462.6 ml, p = 0.047). All the patients in the ARLN-group achieved successful splenic artery dissection, while surgical success was achieved in 12 patients in the Non-ARLN group (p = 0.044). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the Non-ARLN group (3.8 days vs. 4.5 days, p = 0.040).ConclusionsARLN can provide feasible and accurate intraoperative image guidance, and it could be helpful in the performance of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the clinical impact and technical feasibility of applying the augmented reality laparoscopic navigation (ARLN) system in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Specifically, the paper explores whether the ARLN system can provide feasible and accurate intraoperative image guidance, thereby helping to improve the safety and efficiency of the operation, especially when dealing with technical challenges such as limited surgical field of view and difficult organ manipulation. The paper evaluates the effect of the ARLN system by comparing the differences in intraoperative blood loss, success rate of splenic artery dissection, and postoperative hospital stay between patients using the ARLN system and those not using it. The results show that the group using the ARLN system performs better in these key indicators, indicating that the ARLN system can effectively improve the surgical effect, reduce complications, and shorten the hospital stay.