Abstract:This study examines the association between Chinese stock issuers’ board characteristics and dividends. We focus on the gender of CEO and accompanying board members, as well as other salient board demographics and characteristics. Using more than 9,000 firm-year observations, we observe little difference in the dividend distributions of female- and male-led Chinese firms. Other salient demographics, notably CEO age and tenure bear a strong positive association with cash distributions. Cash pay-out is also increasing in directors’ equity stakes and state ownership. In a general sense, the proportion of independent directors on boards bears only limited association with cash pay-out. However, in state-invested entities, greater independent director presence acts as a brake against cash distributions. We challenge a lingering perception in the investment literature that women are significantly more risk-averse than men. Cross-cultural theory suggests that risk aversion is manifest in greater cash retention and thus lower pay-outs (Bae, Chang, & Kang, The Journal of Financial Research, 35(2): 289–316, 2012; Khambata & Liu, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 6(4): 31–43, 2005). Building on this literature, and extending it specifically to gender, our results are consistent with male and female CEOs displaying comparable levels of risk aversion. They are also congruent with “financial knowledge” lessening gender-based differences in risk aversion (Hibbert, Lawrence, & Prakash, Global Finance Journal, 24: 140–152, 2013) and/or its general absence in the specific field of financial decisions (Schubert, Brown, Gysler, & Brachinger, The American Economic Review, 89(2): 381–385, 1999). We also emphasize theory on managerial power (Allen, Social Forces, 60(2): 482–494, 1981) and entrenchment. Results for CEO tenure and age support notions of CEO entrenchment, while those for duality do not. In contrast to agency theory, but consistent with tunneling arguments, the present study stresses the overarching role of state-ownership in increasing (decreasing) cash (stock) payouts. We observe non-monotonic effects in this relation, thus extending related findings elsewhere (Huang, Chen, & Kao, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 39–58, 2012).

Less is more: Evidence from firms with low cash and debt

Family control and corporate cash holdings: evidence from China

Trust and Corporate Cash Holdings

Does CFO Gender Matter in Corporate Cash Holdings? Evidence from an Emerging Country

Corporate Governance and Cash Holdings: Evidence from Worldwide Board Reforms

Corporate Cash Reserves and Corporate Governance Mechanism: the Empirical Study of the Chinese Publicly Traded Corporations

External financing, corporate governance and the value of cash holdings

Free cash flow, over-investment and corporate governance in China

Does Corporate Governance Affect Corporate Cash Holdings -- Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Confucianism culture and corporate cash holdings

Corporate Governance and Firm Liquidity: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Does culture matter in corporate cash holdings?

Country risk, global uncertainty, and firms' cash holdings: Do the role of law, culture, and financial market development matter?

Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings in the U.S.

Can't Debt Come into Play Governance Effect Really?The New Evidence Based on the Listed Real Estate Companies in China

The sensitivity of corporate cash holdings to corporate governance

Internal controls, risk management, and cash holdings

The Effect of Drinking Culture on Corporate Cash Holdings

Government–Business Relations and Corporate Cash Holdings: Evidence from China*

Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance

The Negative Corporate Governance Impact of Distracted Shareholders: Evidence from Value of Cash Holdings