ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—2002: summary article: a report of the American …

Committee Members, Eugene Braunwald, Elliott M Antman, John W Beasley, Robert M Califf, Melvin D Cheitlin, Judith S Hochman, Robert H Jones, Dean Kereiakes, Joel Kupersmith, Thomas N Levin, Carl J Pepine, John W Schaeffer, Earl E Smith III, David E Steward, Pierre Theroux, Raymond J Gibbons, Elliott M Antman, Joseph S Alpert, David P Faxon, Valentin Fuster, Gabriel Gregoratos, Loren F Hiratzka, Alice K Jacobs, Sidney C Smith Jr
2002-10-01
Abstract:The weight of the evidence was ranked highest (A) if the data were derived from multiple randomized clinical trials that involved large numbers of patients and intermediate (B) if the data were derived from a limited number of randomized trials that involved small numbers of patients or from careful analyses of nonrandomized studies or observational registries. A lower rank (C) was given when expert consensus was the primary basis for the recommendation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?