1035 Automated Analysis of REM Sleep Without Atonia in the Lewy Body Disease Spectrum

Jack Jagielski,Makayla Kelleher,Thomas Finstuen,Laurene LeClair-Visonneau,Kantarci Kejal,Stuart McCarter,Bradley Boeve,Silber Michael,Brynn Dredla,Erik St Louis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01035
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Quantitative rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RSWA) recorded during polysomnography (PSG) represents loss of normal REM sleep atonia. RSWA is the neurophysiologic signature of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Visually scored RSWA is a candidate biomarker for synucleinopathies. However, visual RSWA scoring requires expert scoring, limiting widespread application. We comparatively analyzed RSWA in DLB and iRBD using the automated Ferri REM Atonia Index (RAI). Methods We quantitatively analyzed the RAI in 17 DLB and 20 iRBD patients, compared to 20 controls using Hypnolab Software for Sleep Analysis (SWS Soft, Colognola ai Colli, Italy). PSG data were converted to European Data Format (.EDF), and the submentalis surface electromyogram (EMG) signal was notch-filtered at 60 Hertz and rectified. Automatically calculated RAI scores were comparatively analyzed across groups (DLB, iRBD, controls) using Kruskal Wallis H tests for group comparisons, and regression analyses determined relationships between diagnosis, age, and sex. Logistic regression ROC determined optimal RAI for distinguishing iRBD from DLB. When interpreting RAI, lower values represent greater amounts of RSWA, and higher values represent more normal REM atonia. Results Median age was no different between DLB (72.6 years), iRBD (69.4 years), and controls (68.0 years). The DLB group consisted of 16 men and one woman, the iRBD group had 18 men and 2 women, and controls were comprised of 16 men and 4 women. Median RAI was lowest in DLB (0.32), intermediate in iRBD (0.84) and highest in controls (0.96), indicating a gradient in RSWA amounts from DLB patients (highest) to controls (lowest). Regression demonstrated diagnosis independently predicted RAI, controlling for age and sex (adjusted R2=0.64, p=0.0001). The RAI that optimally distinguished iRBD from DLB was 0.48 (specificity 85%, sensitivity 76%, AUC=0.88). Conclusion The RAI demonstrated a clear gradient throughout the Lewy body spectrum; highest (indicating lowest RSWA amounts) in controls, intermediate in iRBD, and lowest (indicating greatest RSWA) in DLB. The RAI is a promising, time efficient and broadly applicable candidate biomarker for DLB and iRBD. Automated quantitative RSWA could be a valuable tool for deep phenotyping throughout the Lewy body disease spectrum. Support (if any) This study was supported by: U01NS100620, R34AG056639, U19AG071754, and P30AG62677.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper mainly explores the possibility of using heart rate changes (using the Autonomic Activation Index, AAI) as a potential digital biomarker to distinguish Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) from Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Specifically: 1. **Problem background**: - The clinical manifestations of LBD and AD overlap, leading to difficulties in diagnosis. - Symptoms of autonomic nervous system dysfunction are more common in LBD patients and may be related to the accumulation of α - synuclein in neurons and glial cells. 2. **Research hypothesis**: - The researchers hypothesized that the spontaneous heart rate acceleration or deceleration (measured by AAI) in LBD patients would be weaker than that in AD patients. 3. **Research methods**: - The study recruited 10 LBD patients and 6 AD patients and conducted a two - night home sleep test on them. - AAI is defined as an increase or decrease in the pulse rate by 6 beats per minute relative to the previous or next 10 - second period. - The average AAI of each participant was calculated, and the average AAI, sleep efficiency, REM stage, and N3 stage were compared between the two groups. 4. **Research results**: - Although the AAI in the LBD group was lower, the difference was not statistically significant (AD group: 24.1 ± 23.1; LBD group: 11.2 ± 10.6; p = 0.3). - The percentage of REM sleep time in the LBD group was significantly lower than that in the AD group (AD group: 18.3 ± 4.3; LBD group: 8.4 ± 8.2; p = 0.007). - The differences in other indicators such as N3 sleep state and sleep efficiency were not significant. 5. **Conclusion**: - The heart rate change (AAI) was lower in LBD patients, but the difference was not significant, which may be due to the small sample size. - The REM sleep time of LBD patients was significantly lower than that of AD patients. - Future research needs to further verify whether the heart rate change during sleep can be used as a digital biomarker to distinguish LBD and AD. ### Summary The paper aims to explore the feasibility of using heart rate changes (AAI) during sleep as a potential digital biomarker to distinguish LBD from AD. Although the preliminary results show that the AAI in LBD patients is lower, the difference is not significant due to the small sample size. Therefore, more research is needed to verify this finding.