Abstract:Resource-based cities (RBCs) have made outstanding contributions to China's social and economic development over recent decades. Nevertheless, with the worsening climate change and the exhausted resources, how to curb carbon emissions of RBCs to deliver their low-carbon transformation is becoming a problem plaguing the world. To facilitate the low-carbon transformation of RBCs, the Chinese government has formulated many policies, including the Sustainable Development Policy of National Resource-based Cities, 2013–2020 (SDPRC). However, the implementation of SDPRC has not yielded a clear environmental influence. Therefore, this study employs the Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Difference to investigate this influence based on the panel data of 285 prefecture-level cities from 2006 to 2017 while exploring the related heterogeneity and impact mechanisms. It is found that: (1) the implementation of SDPRC has significantly reduced carbon emissions and intensities of RBCs, with this effect becoming more conspicuous with the advancement of the policy. A robust test also verifies these findings. (2) Results from the heterogeneity test demonstrate that the implementation of SDPRC has imposed a suppressive effect on CO2 emissions in eastern, central, and western Chinese regions, especially pronounced in the latter two regions. Except for the growing cities, which are not significantly affected by the policy, the other three types of cities have seen a catalytic effect on CO2 emission reduction from the implementation of the policy, with the most significant impact observed in the declining cities. (3) Analyses of related mechanisms reveal that thanks to the implementation of SDPRC, RBCs suppress CO2 emissions mainly by optimizing their industrial structures and relieving their energy intensities. Finally, some policy recommendations are proposed based on the findings of this study to facilitate the low-carbon transformation of RBCs.

Did civilized city policy improve energy efficiency of resource-based cities? Prefecture-level evidence from China

The Effects of China's Supporting Policy for Resource-Exhausted Cities on Local Energy Efficiency: an Empirical Study Based on 284 Cities in China

Are smart cities more ecologically efficient? Evidence from China

The influence of smart city policy on urban green energy efficiency -- A quasi-natural experiment based on 196 cities

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Development on Urban Energy Efficiency—Based on the Perspective of Smart City Policy

Urban low-carbon governance and ecological efficiency: new evidence from prefecture-level cities in China

Is the metabolic efficiency of smart cities higher? Evidence from China

The effectiveness of smart city policy on pollution reduction in China: new evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

The improvement of energy-consuming right trading policy on the efficiency of urban green development

Impact of new energy demonstration city policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China

Characteristics and Causes of Chinese Urban Energy Efficiency

A significance of smart city pilot policies in China for enhancing carbon emission efficiency in construction

The impact of smart city construction on urban energy efficiency: evidence from China

Did China's energy consumption permit trading scheme improve green economic efficiency? Prefecture-level evidence from China

Energy Efficiency Analysis of China’s Resource-based Cities under Different Scenarios — Based on the Super-SBM Model

Environmental regulation and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China

The Effects of Broadband Infrastructure on Carbon Emission Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities in China: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the "Broadband China" Pilot Policy

Impact of China's Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies on Enterprise Energy Efficiency

Does Innovative City Policy Improve Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency? Evidence from China

Can sustainable development policy reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from resource-based cities in China