Aggregation‐Enhanced Photodynamic Activity of Organometallic Ru(II)–Arene Complexes

Jingjing Bu,Zhiwei Xu,Yanyan Sun,Ya Gao,Jian Zhao,Gang Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.7783
IF: 3.9
2024-09-26
Applied Organometallic Chemistry
Abstract:Ru(II)–arene complexes 1–3 produced negligible 1O2 generation in the monomeric state but induce substantial 1O2 generation in the aggregated state due to the restriction of the intramolecular vibration and rotation, thereby reducing the non‐radiative decay process, which indicated that the photokinetic processes of the organometallic Ru(II)–arene complexes could be tuned via aggregation. In phototherapy, complexes 1–3 exhibited potent photocytotoxicity against A549 cells, serving as efficient photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Organometallic Ru(II)–arene complexes have emerged as potential chemotherapeutic agents for improved cancer treatment. However, the application of Ru(II)–arene complexes as photosensitizers has been rarely explored. In consideration of their excellent biological performance, herein, three Ru(II)–arene complexes 1–3 bearing 2,3,8,9,14,15‐hexamethyl‐5,6,11,12,17,18‐hexaazatrinapthalene (HATN‐Me6) as acceptor ligand have been designed and investigated as potential photosensitizers. Distinctively, complexes 1–3 produced negligible singlet oxygen (1O2) generation in DMF. The mechanism investigations indicated that the large change in equilibrium displacement between the excited and ground states rather than narrow energy gap results in the increased vibrational wave function overlap and non‐radiative decay rate. Remarkably, complexes 1–3 induced greatly enhanced 1O2 generation efficiency in an aggregated state due to the suppression of the non‐radiative decay process, implying that the electronic structures of excited states play an essential role in the photochemical properties and functions of the organometallic Ru(II)–arene complexes. The biological evaluation showed that complexes 1–3 exhibited potent photocytotoxicity against cancer cells, highlighting that organometallic Ru(II)–arene scaffolds are potential platforms for the fabrication of efficient photosensitizers.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?