Clinical supervision effectiveness in NHS nursing, medical and allied health professionals: Exploring interaction with workplace factors, supervision factors and burnout

Emma Sellers,Sarah Craven‐Staines,Claire Vaughan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14149
2024-10-24
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Abstract:Objectives The study aimed to (1) determine if a variety of workplace and supervision factors predict clinical supervision effectiveness; and (2) establish if clinical supervision effectiveness predicts burnout, amongst a variety of mental health staff (medical, allied health, and nursing staff). Design The study adopted a multicentre cross‐sectional online survey design. Methods Participants included 204 mental health staff (89 allied health staff, 81 nursing staff, and 34 medical staff). The Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale (MCSS‐26) was used to measure clinical supervision effectiveness, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI‐HSS) was used to measure burnout. Linear regression analyses and multiple regression analyses were conducted. Results The main findings suggested that supervision frequency, supervision duration, choice of supervisor, workplace setting, and supervisee profession, were all significant predictors of clinical supervision effectiveness. Additionally, clinical supervision effectiveness was a significant negative predictor of burnout. Conclusions Workplace and supervision factors should be considered in supervision practice across professional groups. Policies need to promote effective clinical supervision practice.
medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?