Environmental impact of different scenarios for the pyrolysis of contaminated mixed plastic waste

Guillermo Garcia-Garcia,María Ángeles Martín-Lara,Mónica Calero,Gabriel Blázquez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3gc04396g

IF: 9.8

2024-02-22

Green Chemistry

Abstract:Every day, large amounts of plastic are disposed of all over the world. Most of it is not recycled and ends up polluting the environment. Therefore, waste collection and management must be improved to reduce the environmental impact caused by plastic waste. Pyrolysis has been explored as an alternative to treat contaminated mixed plastic waste and obtain valuable materials, such as oil and char. These materials can effectively substitute fuel and activated carbon, respectively. However, the pyrolysis process also has a significant environmental impact, mainly due to gas emissions. It is important to quantify this environmental impact and compare it with alternative treatment methods to identify the best management strategy for contaminated mixed plastic waste. This study applies the Life-Cycle Assessment methodology to evaluate the environmental impact and compare it with the conventional practice of landfilling. Three different pyrolysis scenarios are considered: one in which the char is used as fuel and therefore combusted, and two in which the char is activated by carbon dioxide and potassium hydroxide, respectively, to be used as an adsorbent. Our results show that pyrolysis is environmentally superior to landfilling for the treatment of contaminated mixed plastic waste. This is mainly due to the production of oil, which substitutes commercial diesel, the production of which has a high environmental impact. Pyrolysis followed by char combustion has the lowest environmental impact of all pyrolysis scenarios considered.

chemistry, multidisciplinary,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of evaluating the environmental impact of different pyrolysis schemes for treating contaminated mixed plastic waste and comparing them with traditional landfill methods to determine which method is more environmentally beneficial.

Specifically, the study considered three different pyrolysis scenarios:
1. Char is burned as fuel.
2. Char is used as an adsorbent after being activated by carbon dioxide.
3. Char is used as an adsorbent after being activated by potassium hydroxide.

Using the Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) method, the environmental impacts of these scenarios were calculated and compared with the most commonly used landfill method. The main objective of the study is to demonstrate whether pyrolysis can reduce the environmental impact of plastic waste management more effectively than landfilling. The results show that in most cases, pyrolysis is superior to landfilling, especially when char is used as fuel (i.e., scenario 1).