Abstract:With a high proportion of crops requiring animal‐mediated pollination to some extent, understanding how anthropogenic landscapes impact communities and pollination provision is critical for ensuring food security. We find that the species most important for crop pollination are responding less negatively (and sometimes positively) to human disturbance of land compared to other animals. This suggests there is potential for crop pollination to be resilient in the face of anthropogenic land conversions. Animal‐mediated pollination is a key ecosystem service required to some extent by almost three‐quarters of the leading human food crops in global food production. Anthropogenic pressures such as habitat loss and land‐use intensification are causing shifts in ecological community composition, potentially resulting in declines in pollination services and impacting crop production. Previous research has often overlooked interspecific differences in pollination contribution, yet such differences mean that biodiversity declines will not necessarily negatively impact pollination. Here, we use a novel species‐level ecosystem service contribution matrix along with mixed‐effects models to explore how groups of terrestrial species who contribute differently to crop pollination respond globally to land‐use type, land‐use intensity, and availability of natural habitats in the surrounding landscape. We find that the species whose contribution to crop pollination is higher generally respond less negatively (and in some cases positively) to human disturbance of land, compared to species that contribute less or not at all to pollination. This result may be due to these high‐contribution species being less sensitive to anthropogenic land conversions, which has led humans to being more reliant on them for crop pollination. However, it also suggests that there is potential for crop pollination to be resilient in the face of anthropogenic land conversions. With such a high proportion of food crops requiring animal‐mediated pollination to some extent, understanding how anthropogenic landscapes impact ecological communities and the consequences for pollination is critical for ensuring food security.

The impact of pollinator decline on global protein production: implications for livestock and plant-based products

Global meta-analysis shows reduced quality of food crops under inadequate animal pollination

Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops

Impact of Climate Change and Global Warming on Crop Pollinators and their Mitigation Strategies: A Review

Pesticide impacts on insect pollinators: Current knowledge and future research challenges

Widespread vulnerability of flowering plant seed production to pollinator declines

Sustaining Pollinator Diversity through Eco-friendly Management Strategies

Important Crop Pollinators Respond Less Negatively to Anthropogenic Land Use Than Other Animals

Unveiling the benefits and gaps of wild pollinators on nutrition and income

The decline of global pollinator biodiversity in the Anthropocene

A global meta‐analysis reveals contrasting impacts of air, light, and noise pollution on pollination

Temporal Trends In Pollination Deficits And Its Potential Impacts On Chinese Agriculture

Diversity, Importance and Decline of Pollinating Insects in Present Era

The Dependence of Crops for Pollinators and the Economic Value of Pollination in Brazil

Managed Pollinators Improve Oilseed Rape Yield: A Global Meta-Analysis

Economic assessment of entomophilous pollination in crops from Argentina: possible effects of the pollinator crisis in agriculture

Pollinator diversity benefits natural and agricultural ecosystems, environmental health, and human welfare

Loss of pollinator diversity consistently reduces reproductive success for wild and cultivated plants

Crop fertilization affects pollination service provision – Common bean as a case study

Air pollution: a threat to insect pollination

Are agricultural commodity production systems at risk from local biodiversity loss?