Abstract:This article applies and extends the three‐part organizational framework used in the preceding article to a broad range of management innovations. After furnishing some interesting evidence of the rise and fall of management techniques such as TQM, Reengineering, Just‐in‐Time Production, and Activity‐Based Costing, the authors raise and then attempt to answer a number of questions: What explains the popularity of these management innovations? Why do they often fail to produce the expected benefits? How can managers tell if a particular technique is right for them? What can managers do to increase the likelihood that an adopted technique will be successful? The persistent, and at times seemingly insatiable, corporate demand for management innovations is viewed by the authors as a “rational” economic response by senior managers to major changes in the external business environment—changes that in turn dictate changes in business strategy. For example, when confronted with external changes such as deregulation or heightened global competition, companies often find it necessary to refocus their efforts on improving product quality and operating efficiency. And such changes in business strategy tend to require a revamping of the three critical components of organizational architecture: (1) assignment of decision rights, (2) performance evaluation systems, and (3) compensation systems. As the authors argue, innovations such as TQM, outsourcing, Re‐engineering, and JIT typically involve major changes in just one or two of these critical elements of the organization, but not all three. The failure to coordinate organizational changes in such a way that these three elements are mutually consistent and reinforcing is one important reason why management innovations can fail to meet expectations. The framework described in this article is designed to help managers considering one potentially valuable set of organizational changes to identify other facets of the organization that also require attention and perhaps complementary adjustments.

Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation

Management Innovation: Management as Fertile Ground for Innovation

Perspective on Technological Innovation Management of the Enterprise :The State of the Art and Trends

Total Innovation Management: a New Emerging Paradigm of Innovation Management

A Review of Studies on Organizational Innovation

Fueling innovation management research: Future directions and five forward‐looking paths

Intellectual structure analysis of Chinese innovation management research

Management Innovation and Its Measurement

Towards a Longitudinal Outlook on Industry Transition Management

The Evolution of Three Generations Innovation Management-from Event View, Process View to Capability View

Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings

Managing Technological Innovation Portfolio: Experiences and Lessons in China

MANAGEMENT FADS AND ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHITECTURE

Study of Modern Enterprise Management Innovation

Perspective of Technological Innovation and Technology Management in China

Managing innovation portfolio: experiences and lessons in China

Total Innovation Management: a Novel Paradigm of Innovation Management in the 21st Century

Innovation Management and Its Future

Theoretical Trace and Framework of Overall Innovation Management

Research on Technological Innovation Kinds

The Status Quo and Perspective of Management Innovation in Chinese Enterprises