Abstract:Background: Errors in electronic health records are known to contribute to patient safety incidents; however, systems for checking the accuracy of patient records are almost nonexistent. Personal health records (PHRs) enabling patient access to and interaction with the clinical records offer a valuable opportunity for patients to actively participate in error surveillance. Objective: This study aims to evaluate patients' willingness and ability to identify and respond to errors in their PHRs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire. Patient sociodemographic data were collected, including age, sex, ethnicity, educational level, health status, geographical location, motivation to self-manage, and digital health literacy (measured using the eHealth Literacy Scale tool). Patients with experience of using the Care Information Exchange (CIE) portal, who specified both age and sex, were included in these analyses. The patients' responses to 4 relevant survey items (closed-ended questions, some with space for free-text comments) were examined to understand their willingness and ability to identify and respond to errors in their PHRs. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify patients' characteristics that predict the ability to understand information in the CIE and willingness to respond to errors in their records. The framework method was used to derive themes from patients' free-text responses. Results: Of 445 patients, 181 (40.7%) "definitely" understood the CIE information and approximately half (220/445, 49.4%) understood the CIE information "to some extent." Patients with high digital health literacy (eHealth Literacy Scale score ≥26) were more confident in their ability to understand their records compared with patients with low digital health literacy (odds ratio [OR] 7.85, 95% CI 3.04-20.29; P<.001). Information-related barriers (medical terminology and lack of medical guidance or contextual information) and system-related barriers (functionality or usability and information communicated or displayed poorly) were described. Of 445 patients, 79 (17.8%) had noticed errors in their PHRs, which were related to patient demographic details, diagnoses, medical history, results, medications, letters or correspondence, and appointments. Most patients (272/445, 61.1%) wanted to be able to flag up errors to their health professionals for correction; 20.4% (91/445) of the patients were willing to correct errors themselves. Native English speakers were more likely to be willing to flag up errors to health professionals (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.11-10.78; P=.03) or correct errors themselves (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.33-24.03; P=.02). Conclusions: A large proportion of patients were able and willing to identify and respond to errors in their PHRs. However, some barriers persist that disproportionately affect the underserved groups. Further development of PHR systems, including incorporating channels for patient feedback on the accuracy of their records, should address the needs of nonnative English speakers and patients with lower digital health literacy.

Correction: A Call to Reconsider a Nationwide Electronic Health Record System: Correcting the Failures of the National Program for IT

“Computers can land people on Mars, why can’t they get them to work in a hospital?”

Unintended Consequences of Nationwide Electronic Health Record Adoption: Challenges and Opportunities in the Post-Meaningful Use Era

‘Trying to find information is like hating yourself every day’: The collision of electronic information systems in transition with patients in transition

Researching big IT in the UK National Health Service: A systematic review of theory-based studies

Integrated Electronic Health Record System in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Single Centre Implementation Experience

A Scoping Review on the Impacts of Electronic Health Record Systems on Healthcare Delivery

Which Electronic Health Record System Should We Use? A Systematic Review

Enhancing nursing home quality through electronic health record implementation

Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care

Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients

Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study

Assessment of Patients' Ability to Review Electronic Health Record Information to Identify Potential Errors: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey

Healthcare software design and implementation—A project failure case

Multidisciplinary user experience of a newly implemented electronic patient record in Ireland: An exploratory qualitative study

Patients' Willingness and Ability to Identify and Respond to Errors in Their Personal Health Records: Mixed Methods Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Data

Effectiveness and Challenges: The Current Situation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to Improve Health Care Outcomes

NHS Faces Huge Challenge to Become Digitally Driven by 2028, a Decade Later Than Originally Promised

Universal coverage and cost control: the United Kingdom National Health Service

Rethinking the electronic health record through the quadruple aim: time to align its value with the health system

Perceptions of chief clinical information officers on the state of electronic health records systems interoperability in NHS England: a qualitative interview study