Physical inactivity causes exercise resistance of fat metabolism: harbinger or culprit of disease?
Edward F. Coyle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp284169
2024-03-15
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend Prolonged sitting throughout the day with a low step count, as an example of inactivity, impairs postprandial fat metabolism when measured the morning after exercising for 1 h. This is termed 'exercise resistance' because prior exercise normally improves fat metabolism. For optimal fat metabolism and possibly health, exercise is most beneficial when daily physical activity is high because the greater intensity of exercise promotes greater physiological adaptations. Physical activity (defined as >8000 steps/day) is also very important because it counteracts physical inactivity. The ills of physical inactivity are not due to the lack of exercise and appear more powerful than the benefits of exercise. As a result, every 1000 steps/day decrease in physical activity is reported to increase the incidence of cardiovascular disease and death by ∼15%. Physical activity guidelines need to factor in a minimal level of daily background physical activity in addition to exercise recommendations. The interrelationships depicted in this figure are analogous to a popular game rock‐paper‐scissor. Physical inactivity is the fourth leading cause of death in the world. It is associated with myriad diseases and premature death. Two possible contributing factors are postprandial lipidaemia (PPL), which accelerates atherosclerosis, and impaired whole‐body fat oxidation, which contributes to obesity. Acute exercise in physically active people is effective for increasing whole body fat oxidation and lowering PPL the next morning. However, in people who have low physical activity (<8000 steps/day), an acute bout of exercise (1 h at 62% maximal oxygen consumption) has no effect on increasing fat oxidation or reducing PPL ('exercise resistance'). The acute harms of inactivity are not due to the lack of exercise and are more powerful than the benefits of exercise, at least regarding fat metabolism. The increase in mortality with reduced daily steps is remarkably steep. Low background steps/day also impair the metabolic adaptations to short‐term endurance training, suggesting that the ills of inactivity extend beyond fat metabolism. 'Exercise resistance' with inactivity could be a culprit, causing atherosclerosis, or maybe also a harbinger (impaired fat oxidation) of more widespread diseases. Recommendations regarding the amount of moderate to vigorous exercise needed for health should factor in the amount of background activity (i.e. ∼8000 steps/day) necessary to avoid 'exercise resistance'.
neurosciences,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?