Abstract:As the use of robotic aides increases the possibility of telesurgery, the perioperative scope of practice could include using patients' homes or other nontraditional settings as surgical sites. Even mobile surgical vans could be used. To perform telesurgery, the health care industry actively must define the role of the health care professional with the patient who can make an incision and insert a laparoscope. This may create an opportune time to promote the RN first assistant (RNFA) role--a goal that will involve expanding our state nurse practice acts to allow RNFAs to perform various functions for true advanced practice in nontraditional settings. Additionally, it will mean defining what functions and personnel must be available in these new creative settings. Current experiments have focused on using nonlicensed assistants, which can lead to legal and moral concerns. Legal and moral concerns include not only appropriate personnel, but also patient privacy. In telesurgery, patient information would be transmitted over communication lines, possibly seriously jeopardizing patient privacy. Perioperative nurses must be vigilant regarding patient privacy and continue to be patient advocates. Additional concerns relate to the possible complications or emergencies that can occur in any procedure, such as bleeding, cardiac arrest, or malignant hyperthermia. As this field is being developed, these concerns must be addressed, and possible complications and emergencies must be prepared for. All patients deserve highly trained individuals to care for them. It is a concern that unlicensed personnel are being considered to manage these potentially serious situations. It is now more important than ever that perioperative nurses stay on top of technologic advances. One surgeon stated that perioperative nurses are at a point in history in which they can make a difference--a potentially lifesaving difference. Nurses will have to be comfortable with new technology, know when it is working well, and be able to assess the patient's status critically. The use of robotic aides can decrease the amount of physical work that nurses do; however, they also have the capability to denigrate nurses' positions. If not careful, nurses could lose their focus on the caring aspect of the nursing profession. Although computers remain machines programmed by humans, it seems they more often are masters of information. Today, procedures can be performed in cyberspace as if surgeons were present at the surgical sites. Could robotic aides and computers do a better job than physicians and nurses, causing these health care providers to become extinct? Probably not. Although robots and computers may be able to replicate the knowledge and skill of physicians, patients require human interaction that computers cannot provide. This involves feelings and human communication beyond current technology, despite robotic engineers' continuing attempts to replicate this. The ultimate use of robotics remains uncertain; however, the human touch will not soon, if ever, be replaced by robotic technology. It is now of utmost urgency that all perioperative nurses refine and hone the caring skills that Florence Nightingale instilled to ensure their professional future. Robotics is a new and challenging aspect being added to nursing care. Nurses must take an active role, embrace this technology, and work to maximize their position with it.

Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS): Perioperative Nursing Professional Development Program

Suggested robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training curriculum

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Surgical Simulation in Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Patient Safety

Robotic Assisted Transplant Nephrectomy: Case Series and Training Model for Improving Adoption

Approaches and outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review

The future of robotics can be ours

Postoperative Management of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Understanding the challenges of robotic-assisted surgery adoption: Perspectives from stakeholders and the general population on human-interaction, built environment, and training

Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries

An Introduction to Robotically Assisted Surgical Systems: Current Developments and Focus Areas of Research

Training and education of operating room nurses in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review

Nursing Cooperation for Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Surgery

Factors affecting the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer

The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programmes

Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Training Programs: A National Needs Assessment

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for stages IIB–IVA non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective study of feasibility and outcome

Is RATS Superior to VATS in Thoracic Autonomic Nervous System Surgery?

Robot-assisted surgery in thoracic and visceral indications: an updated systematic review