Abstract:Are all protein interactions fully optimized? Do suboptimal interactions compromise specificity? What is the functional impact of frustration? Why does evolution not optimize some contacts? Proteins and their complexes are best described as ensembles of states populating an energy landscape. These ensembles vary in breadth from narrow ensembles clustered around a single average X-ray structure to broader ensembles encompassing a few different functional "taxonomic" states on to near continua of rapidly interconverting conformations, which are called "fuzzy" or even "intrinsically disordered". Here we aim to provide a comprehensive framework for confronting the structural and dynamical continuum of protein assemblies by combining the concepts of energetic frustration and interaction fuzziness. The diversity of the protein structural ensemble arises from the frustrated conflicts between the interactions that create the energy landscape. When frustration is minimal after folding, it results in a narrow ensemble, but residual frustrated interactions result in fuzzy ensembles, and this fuzziness allows a versatile repertoire of biological interactions. Here we discuss how fuzziness and frustration play off each other as proteins fold and assemble, viewing their significance from energetic, functional, and evolutionary perspectives.We demonstrate, in particular, that the common physical origin of both concepts is related to the ruggedness of the energy landscapes, intramolecular in the case of frustration and intermolecular in the case of fuzziness. Within this framework, we show that alternative sets of suboptimal contacts may encode specificity without achieving a single structural optimum. Thus, we demonstrate that structured complexes may not be optimized, and energetic frustration is realized via different sets of contacts leading to multiplicity of specific complexes. Furthermore, we propose that these suboptimal, frustrated, or fuzzy interactions are under evolutionary selection and expand the biological repertoire by providing a multiplicity of biological activities. In accord, we show that non-native interactions in folding or interaction landscapes can cooperate to generate diverse functional states, which are essential to facilitate adaptation to different cellular conditions. Thus, we propose that not fully optimized structures may actually be beneficial for biological activities of proteins via an alternative set of suboptimal interactions. The importance of such variability has not been recognized across different areas of biology.This account provides a modern view on folding, function, and assembly across the protein universe. The physical framework presented here is applicable to the structure and dynamics continuum of proteins and opens up new perspectives for drug design involving not fully structured, highly dynamic protein assemblies.This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

A contact‐based analysis of local energetic frustration dynamics identifies key residues enabling RfaH fold‐switch

Global Fold Switching of the RafH Protein: Diverse Structures with a Conserved Pathway

Impact of N-Terminal Domain Conformation and Domain Interactions on RfaH Fold Switching

The Folding Transition State of Protein L is Extensive with Nonnative Interactions (and Not Small and Polarized)

Many dissimilar protein domains switch between α-helix and β-sheet folds

Distinguishing features of fold‐switching proteins

Frustraevo: a web server to localize and quantify the conservation of local energetic frustration in protein families

Folding Rate Optimization Promotes Frustrated Interactions in Entangled Protein Structures

Fuzziness and Frustration in the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding, Function, and Assembly

Single-molecule Force Spectroscopy of the Add Adenine Riboswitch Relates Folding to Regulatory Mechanism

Ratcheted molecular-dynamics simulations identify efficiently the transition state of protein folding

Energetic frustrations in protein folding at residue resolution: a simulation study of homologous immunoglobulin-like \b{eta}-sandwich proteins

Structural conversion of the transformer protein RfaH: new insights derived from protein structure prediction and molecular dynamics simulations

Molecular Dynamics Study on Folding and Allostery in RfaH

Structural and Dynamic Mechanisms for Coupled Folding and Trna Recognition of a Translational T-box Riboswitch.

Perturbative diffraction methods resolve a conformational switch that facilitates a two-step enzymatic mechanism

Inaccurate secondary structure predictions often indicate protein fold switching

Simulating Protein Fold Switching by Replica-Exchange-with-Tunneling.

Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state

Consequences of Energetic Frustration on the Ligand-Coupled Folding/Dimerization Dynamics of Allosteric Protein S100A12.

Force Spectroscopy of Add Adenine Riboswitch Aptamer Folding Reveals Multiple Intermediate and Misfolded States