Abstract:The success of the geographical indication industry relies on the collaborative value creation among its stakeholders. This article presents an evolutionary game model for the triad of associations, firms, and peasant households in the geographical indication industry. The model examines their strategic choices and analyzes the impact of profitability, scale factors, and premium factors across different developmental stages. The study uncovers that while all parties may display collective behavior, there are variations specific to each stage. In periods of low profitability, firms tend to adopt a more cautious approach, while peasant households prioritize overall benefits. Both scale factors and premium factors guide the game towards positive strategies. Consequently, it is recommended to strengthen associations' leadership role by fostering firm accountability in quality governance, reducing costs and risks associated with peasant household participation, safeguarding their rights and interests, enhancing economies of scale for geographical indication products, and bolstering competitiveness and sustainability.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily aims to address the issue of value co-creation mechanisms within the geographical indications (GI) industry. Specifically, the research focuses on the interactions and collaborations among three key participants in the GI industry value chain—industry associations, enterprises, and farmers. By constructing an evolutionary game model, the authors explore the strategic choices of these entities at different stages of industry development and analyze the impact of profitability, scale factors, and premium factors on these choices.
The main objectives of the paper can be summarized as follows:
1. **Explore the interactions and participation patterns among industry associations, enterprises, and farmers within the GI industry**: Based on evolutionary game theory, the study investigates how these three types of entities co-create value in the GI industry.
2. **Examine the similarities and differences in interactions among the three parties at different stages of industry development (exploration, expansion, leadership, and renewal)**: By simulating the input-output ratio at different stages, the study explores the changes in strategic choices of each entity.
3. **Analyze the similarities and differences in interactions among the three parties within different GI industries**: The industries are categorized based on factors such as return on investment, industry scale, and product premium, to establish different scenarios and examine the strategic choices of the three parties in different industry environments.
Through this research, the authors hope to reveal the key factors for success in the GI industry and propose recommendations for promoting high-quality development of the industry, including strengthening the leadership role of industry associations, enhancing the quality governance responsibilities of enterprises, and reducing the costs and risks for farmers' participation. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of economies of scale and brand premiums for GI products, as well as how these factors influence the value co-creation activities of the participants.