Managing Your Muse: Exploring Three Levels of Metacognitive Control in Creative Ideation

Mathias BenedekIzabela Lebudaa University of Grazb University of Wrocław

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2347770

IF: 2.032

2024-05-14

Creativity Research Journal

Abstract:Creative ideation tasks are typically ill-defined and thus should benefit from metacognition. However, the role of metacognitive processes―especially metacognitive control―in creative ideation appears understudied. Therefore, we conducted an online study investigating the relationship between different aspects of metacognitive control and divergent thinking (DT) performance. In line with the recently proposed creative metacognition framework , we devised measures that delineate metacognitive control at the levels of task, performance, and responses: Metacognitive control at task level was assessed in terms of attention focus devoted to each task; metacognitive control at performance level was assessed in terms of the goal-directedness of the employed task strategy; metacognitive control at response level was assessed in terms of how effectively uncreative ideas were screened out. We observed substantial individual differences in all three measures as well as first evidence of their validity. Importantly, metacognitive control at all three levels independently predicted higher DT creativity. Additional analyses suggested that effects of metacognitive control may extend to creative behavior, partly mediated by DT. In sum, this study provides first empirical support for the relevance of distinguishable aspects of metacognitive control at task, performance, and response levels in creative performance.

psychology, multidisciplinary, educational

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper primarily explores the role of metacognitive control in creative thinking tasks and attempts to empirically verify how different levels of metacognitive control affect the performance of divergent thinking (DT).

### Research Background and Purpose

The author points out that in creative thinking tasks, people usually face ambiguous problems that cannot be solved based on past experiences or direct analytical methods. Creative thinking tasks often require individuals to both generate new ideas and evaluate the creativity of these ideas. Therefore, the paper aims to explore how different aspects of metacognitive control—namely task-level, performance-level, and response-level metacognitive control—affect the performance of creative thinking.

### Main Findings

1. **Task-Level Metacognitive Control** (MCC-T): Measures the participants' focus on the task. The results show that higher task focus is associated with better DT creativity, although the correlation with DT fluency (i.e., the number of ideas generated) is weaker.

2. **Performance-Level Metacognitive Control** (MCC-P): Assessed by evaluating the goal-directedness of the strategies adopted by participants. The study found that more goal-directed strategies are associated with better DT creativity and slightly higher fluency.

3. **Response-Level Metacognitive Control** (MCC-R): Evaluated by measuring the creativity of the participants' worst ideas in the DT task. The results show that higher MCC-R leads to fewer ideas but higher creativity of the best ideas.

### Conclusion

- The study indicates that metacognitive control at all three levels independently predicts higher DT creativity.
- Performance-level metacognitive control contributes the most to DT creativity.
- Task-level metacognitive control, while not significantly predicting DT fluency, is related to DT creativity.
- Response-level metacognitive control supports a quality-over-quantity approach, thereby enhancing the quality of the best ideas.

### Significance

This study provides preliminary empirical evidence supporting the importance of different aspects of metacognitive control in creative performance and offers a theoretical basis for further understanding the metacognitive mechanisms in the creative thinking process.