Abstract:Importance: Adolescent obesity requires effective and accessible treatment. Intensive dietary interventions have the potential to be used as adjunctive therapy for behavioral weight management. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of 2 diet therapies, delivered as part of an intensive behavioral weight management intervention, in adolescents with metabolic complications associated with obesity. Design, setting, and participants: This multisite, 52-week randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 31, 2018, to March 31, 2023, at 2 tertiary pediatric centers in Australia. Adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with obesity and 1 or more associated complications were included. Interventions: Intensive behavioral interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary team, comparing intermittent energy restriction (IER) or continuous energy restriction (CER), with 3 phases: very low-energy diet (weeks 0-4), intensive intervention (weeks 5-16), and continued intervention and/or maintenance (weeks 17-52). Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was body mass index (BMI) z score at 52 weeks in the IER vs CER group. Anthropometry, body composition, and cardiometabolic health were assessed at baseline and 52 weeks. The BMI z score and percentiles were determined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts. Insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and elevated hepatic function were assessed. Results: A total of 141 adolescents (median [IQR] age, 14.8 [12.9-17.9] years; 71 male [50.4%]) were enrolled, 71 in the IER group and 70 in the CER group, and 97 (68.8%) completed the intervention, 43 in the IER group and 54 in the CER group. At week 52, both groups had reduced BMI z scores (estimated marginal mean change, -0.28 [95% CI, -0.37 to -0.20] for IER and -0.28 [95% CI, -0.36 to -0.20] for CER) and reduced BMI expressed as a percentage of the 95th percentile (estimated marginal mean change, -9.56 [95% CI, -12.36 to -6.83] for IER and -9.23 [95% CI, -11.82 to -6.64] for CER). No differences were found in body composition or cardiometabolic outcomes between the groups. Both groups had a reduction in the occurrence of insulin resistance (from 52 of 68 [76.5%] to 32 of 56 [57.1%] in the IER group and from 59 of 68 [86.8%] to 31 of 60 [57.1%] in the CER group) at week 16; however, at week 52, this effect was observed in the CER group only (from 59 of 68 [86.7%] to 30 of 49 [61.2%]). The occurrence of dyslipidemia was unchanged between baseline and week 52 (60 of 137 [42.6%] and 37 of 87 [42.5%], respectively), with a small improvement in occurrence of impaired hepatic function tests (37 of 139 [27.0%] and 15 of 87 [17.2%], respectively). No differences were found in dyslipidemia or hepatic function between groups. Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that for adolescents with obesity-associated complications, IER can be incorporated into a behavioral weight management program, providing an option in addition to CER and offering participants more choice. Trial registration: http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617001630303.

Continuous versus Intermittent Dieting for Fat Loss and Fat-Free Mass Retention in Resistance-trained Adults: The ICECAP Trial

Effect of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction on weight loss and weight maintenance after 12 months in healthy overweight or obese adults

Intermittent v. continuous energy restriction: differential effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism following matched weight loss in overweight/obese participants

Effects of intermittent (5:2) or continuous energy restriction on basal and postprandial metabolism: a randomised study in normal-weight, young participants

Intermittent Dieting: Theoretical Considerations for the Athlete

Intermittent energy restriction ameliorates adipose tissue-associated inflammation in adults with obesity: A randomised controlled trial

Effects of Intermittent Compared with Continuous Energy Restriction on Blood Pressure Control in Overweight and Obese Patients with Hypertension.

Intermittent Energy Restriction for Adolescents With Obesity: The Fast Track to Health Randomized Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting and Time-Restricted Feeding Compared to Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss

High-Intensity Interval Training and Isocaloric Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Result in Similar Improvements in Body Composition and Fitness in Obese Individuals

Effect of Intermittent vs. Continuous Energy Restriction on Visceral Fat: Protocol for The Healthy Diet and Lifestyle Study 2 (HDLS2)

Effectiveness of an intermittent fasting diet versus continuous energy restriction on anthropometric measurements, body composition and lipid profile in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis

Effects of intermittent dieting with break periods on body composition and metabolic adaptation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Do intermittent diets provide physiological benefits over continuous diets for weight loss? A systematic review of clinical trials

Rationale for novel intermittent dieting strategies to attenuate adaptive responses to energy restriction

The Role of Intermittent Energy Restriction Diet on Metabolic Profile and Weight Loss among Obese Adults

How hard should you train? A meta-analysis of studies comparing body composition changes between interval training and moderate intensity continuous training

Slow and Steady, or Hard and Fast? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Body Composition Changes between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training

Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss?

A 12-month randomised controlled trial using intensive dietary interventions for adolescents with obesity associated complications

Effect of intermittent versus continuous calorie restriction on body weight and cardiometabolic risk markers in subjects with overweight or obesity and mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized trial