Abstract:Diversity plays an important role in various domains, including conservation, whether it describes diversity within a population or diversity over a set of species. While various strategies for measuring among-species diversity have emerged (e.g. Phylogenetic Diversity (PD), Split System Diversity (SSD) and entropy-based methods), extensions to populations are rare. An understudied problem is how to assess the diversity of a collection of populations where each has its own internal diversity. Relying solely on measures that treat each population as a monomorphic lineage (like a species) can be misleading. To address this problem, we present four population-level diversity assessment approaches: Pooling, Averaging, Pairwise Differencing, and Fixing. These approaches can be used to extend any diversity measure that is primarily defined for a group of individuals to a collection of populations. We then apply the approaches to two measures of diversity that have been used in conservation—Heterozygosity (Het) and Split System Diversity (SSD)—across a dataset comprising SNP data for 50 anadromous Atlantic salmon populations. We investigate agreement and disagreement between these measures of diversity when used to identify optimal sets of populations for conservation, on both the observed data, and randomized and simulated datasets. The similarity and differences of the maximum-diversity sets as well as the pairwise correlations among our proposed measures emphasize the need to clearly define what aspects of biodiversity we aim to both measure and optimize, to ensure meaningful and effective conservation decisions. Measuring diversity has several implications including conservation prioritization. However, accurately assessing genetic diversity across multiple populations while considering both within and among population variations is often overlooked. Our study addresses this gap by introducing four novel methods, allowing a better understanding of measuring diversity across populations from different perspectives. We applied these methods to simulated data and data from Atlantic salmon populations. The results sometimes disagree on which populations are most important for conservation, highlighting the need for clear biodiversity goals in conservation decisions. It's important to note that there isn't a single correct answer to the question of how to measure diversity, and the best approach is likely to depend on the conservation priorities and criteria under consideration. By understanding the reason behind these differences, we can make more informed choices to protect our natural world. This research contributes to a broader understanding of diversity and can help guide areas where measuring diversity is important.

Unbiased estimation of sampling variance for Simpson's diversity index

Unbiased estimation of sampling variance for Simpson's diversity index

Measuring metrics: what diversity indicators are most appropriate for different forms of data bias?

Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics

How to partition diversity

Measurements of Intrahost Viral Diversity Require an Unbiased Diversity Metric

Theory and application of an improved species richness estimator

Robust estimation of microbial diversity in theory and in practice

The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections

Sampling Biases Shape Our View of the Natural World

Distance and T-square sampling for spatial measures of tree diversity

Controlling the effects of sampling bias in biodiversity models

A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Species Richness Estimation

Estimating diversity via frequency ratios

Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies

Measuring genetic diversity across populations

Species richness estimation with high diversity but spurious singletons

Model for Diversity Analysis of Antigen Receptor Repertoires

Estimates of heterozygosity from single nucleotide polymorphism markers are context‐dependent and often wrong

Inference for changes in biodiversity

Richness estimation with species identity error