Effect of administration sequence of induction agents on first‐attempt failure during emergency intubation: A Bayesian analysis of a prospective cohort

Pierre Catoire,Brian Driver,Matthew E. Prekker,Yonathan Freund
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15031
2024-10-20
Academic Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Background Emergency tracheal intubation is associated with a risk of clinical adverse events, including the risk of first‐attempt failure. Induction agents usually include a sedative and a neuromuscular blocking agent (i.e., paralytic). Whether the order of administration (i.e., sedative vs. paralytic given first) is associated with first‐attempt failure or adverse events is unknown. Methods This study analyzed data from a single‐center prospective cohort collected from 2021 to 2024 at Hennepin County Medical Center, which included all patients undergoing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Patients with no detail on administration sequence order were excluded. A Bayesian logistic regression analysis was used to measure the effect of drug sequence order (sedative first vs. paralytic first). The primary outcome was first‐attempt failure. The key secondary outcome was peri‐intubation hypoxemia (SpO2
emergency medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?