EFFECT OF MOTOR IMAGERY TRAINING IN COMBINATION WITH ELECTROMYOGRAPHY-TRIGGERED ELECTRICAL STIMULATION IN STROKE WITH HEMIPLEGIA PATIENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

Young-Jin Jung,Jong-Bae Choi,Gihyoun Lee,Ji-su Park,Sang-Hoon Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519419400621
2019-12-01
Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Abstract:Recently, motor imagery training combined with electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation (MIT EMG-ES) has been reported as a remedial treatment for stroke patients. However, the clinical evidence of the effect is still lacking. To investigate the effect of MIT EMG-ES on lower extremities and activities of daily of living (ADL) in patients with stroke, the participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group ([Formula: see text]) or control group ([Formula: see text]). The experimental group underwent MIT EMG-ES, whereas the control group performed underwent motor imagery training. In addition, both groups received the same conventional rehabilitation therapy. All participants underwent treatment for 30[Formula: see text]min a day, 5 sessions per week, for 4 weeks. Lower extremities function was measured by the Fugl–Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test and 10 m Walk (10[Formula: see text]MW) test. ADL were measured by the Korea version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). The experimental group except for the FMA-LE group showed more improvement in TUG and 10[Formula: see text]MW test scores than the control group ([Formula: see text]). The effect size showed FMA-LE, TUG, and 10[Formula: see text]MW test (0.7, 1.0, 0.7, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in K-MBI ([Formula: see text]). Our findings suggest that MIT EMG-ES may be a novel treatment for lower extremities function in patients with stroke better than MIT alone.
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?