Salt versus no salt restriction in heart failure a review

Paolo Raggi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14265
2024-06-27
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Abstract:Central illustration: In the long‐term arm wrestling between supporters and opponents of sodium restriction, the dial has turned toward a more liberal intake of sodium, since neither observational studies or randomized trials showed any outcome benefit of a strict low sodium diet. The only exception may be a slight symptomatic advantage afforded by sodium restriction. Background For decades standard teaching recommended salt intake (sodium) reduction in patients suffering from heart failure. Neurohumoral activation with subsequent fluid retention provided a solid rationale for this long‐standing recommendation. Until recently no large randomized clinical trial of sodium restriction was available, while some observational studies and metanalyses even suggested a worse outcome with strict sodium restriction in patients with heart failure. Methods In this narrative review we aimed to extricate from the literature whether strict sodium restriction is beneficial in patients with heart failure. We searched PubMed indexed articles between 2000 and 2023 for these terms: heart failure, salt, sodium, fluid intake. Results Most randomized trials were small and showed a wide heterogeneity of interventions. A single large, randomized clinical trial was stopped early due to futility. Overall, there is no evidence that severe sodium restriction reduces the incidence of mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Quality of life and functional class may improve slightly with sodium restriction. Conclusion Morbidity and mortality are not reduced with sodium restriction in patients with heart failure, although some symptomatic improvement may be expected.
medicine, general & internal, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?