Abstract:Four experiments are reported demonstrating that mental images are functionally equivalent to physical errors of movement in producing changes in visual-motor coordination, at both central and peripheral levels of the visual-motor system. In the first experiment, subjects in one condition pointed at a target seen through laterally displacing prisms and were instructed to imagine pointing errors identical to those recorded previously for subjects in a separate condition who actually observed their pointing errors. Changes in pointing accuracy during adaptation procedures and visual-motor aftereffects following these procedures for subjects who imagined their errors were proportional to visual-motor shifts and aftereffects for subjects who observed their errors. In the second experiment, these same imagery instructions resulted in identical pointing shifts and aftereffects even in the case where prisms did not displace the target. The third experiment showed that when subjects believe that their mental images of pointing errors do not correspond to their actual pointing errors, pointing aftereffects result that are characteristic of the processing of error information at peripheral, but not central, levels of the visual motor system. The final experiment showed that when subjects do believe that their images of pointing errors correspond to actual pointing errors, but imagine the pointing movement itself in addition to their errors, pointing aftereffects result that are characteristic of the processing of error information at central, but not peripheral, levels of the visual-motor system. Contributions to visual-motor aftereffects from these two levels appear to be additive. Another significant result was that, in the imagery feedback conditions of each experiment, subjects who gave high ratings of vividness to their mental imagery showed the greatest magnitude of pointing aftereffects. These findings establish that mental images for errors of movement can produce stable visual-motor changes that cannot be accounted for simply by subjects' expectations regarding the actual consequences of their actions.

The Functional Equivalence of Imagery and Movement

The Relationship Between Internal Motor Imagery and Motor Inhibition in School-Aged Children: A Cross-Sectional Study

The functional equivalence of mental images and errors of movement

Examining the Equivalence Between Imagery and Execution—Does Imagery Comprise the Intended Spatial Trajectory?

Motor Imagery Enhances Performance Beyond the Imagined Action

Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model

Imagery of movements immediately following performance allows learning of motor skills that interfere

Functional equivalence or behavioural matching? A critical reflection on 15 years of research using the PETTLEP model of motor imagery

Trajectory priming through obstacle avoidance in motor imagery – does motor imagery comprise the spatial characteristics of movement?

Imagery practice of motor skills without conscious awareness?: a commentary to Frank et al.

Unlike overt movement, motor imagery cannot update internal models

Learning motor actions via imagery—perceptual or motor learning?

The PETTLEP Approach to Motor Imagery: A Functional Equivalence Model for Sport Psychologists

Topology highlights mesoscopic functional equivalence between imagery and perception

The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences

The functional alterations associated with motor imagery training: A comparison between motor execution and motor imagery of sequential finger tapping

Picture this! Suggested instructions for guiding the Neuroscience of action imagery: A commentary on Krüger et al. (2022)

Reading motor intention through mental imagery

Imagined and Executed Actions in the Human Motor System: Testing Neural Similarity Between Execution and Imagery of Actions with a Multivariate Approach

A fMRI Study of Motor Simulation on Cognitive Judgment

Concurrent maintenance of visual imagery and short-term memory provides evidence for their distinct representations