Abstract:River restoration programmes with the goal of conserving and rehabilitating inland fishes have a multi‐decadal history, but evaluation and synthesis of past restoration actions have been limited by a lack of monitoring and reporting. Given that calls for both monitoring and systematic reviews of restoration have increased, we were interested in the influence that restoration has had on improving conditions for riverine fishes resulting from long‐standing and increasingly prominent stressors. Our objectives were to (1) identify which stressors were targeted in river restoration efforts, (2) determine the proportion of published studies that articulate restoration goals and develop comparative monitoring designs for assessing the effects of restoration on fishes, and (3) conduct a meta‐analysis to synthesise fish responses to restoration projects. We assessed restoration effectiveness for increasing fish density and richness from peer‐reviewed papers published over the past decade using a global systematic review and meta‐analysis. We found that restoration actions addressed major stressors primarily by improving in‐stream habitat (37%), increasing in‐stream longitudinal connectivity (26%) and increasing lateral floodplain connections (9%). Although 81% of studies had comparative monitoring designs (i.e., before/after and control/impact) and stated restoration goals, only 40% of those studies reported sufficient data to be included in the meta‐analysis. Projects which increased in‐stream connectivity had the largest positive effect size on fish density and richness compared to in‐stream habitat improvements and increasing floodplain connections. Time since restoration and restoration size (i.e., geographical footprint) were not strong predictors of fish response effect sizes. Restoration effectiveness was highly variable among project types. Authors of studies included in the meta‐analysis often identified spatial or temporal scale of monitoring, overriding catchment conditions, and recolonisation potential as sources of variability and effectiveness in restoration outcomes. Systematic reporting of these and other covariates may help guide processes in restoration evaluation and provide valuable research insights. Despite increased emphasis on monitoring, incomplete data reporting limited the number of studies that could be included for quantitative meta‐analysis. Persistent emphasis on setting specific criteria (e.g., measurable outcomes of fish response) for restoration goals, project monitoring, data reporting, information sharing and collaborative projects is likely to continue to improve understanding of restoration effectiveness transferable to future endeavours. Our results can be used to support river restoration practitioners with evidence‐based information to evaluate the cost–benefit ratio of competing restoration priorities, and inform restoration planning and implementation for riverine fish.

The Effects of Meander Reconnection and Deflector Installation on the Physicochemical Water Quality

The Effects of Legacy Sediment Removal and Floodplain Reconnection on Riparian Plant Communities

Reconnecting a stream channel to its floodplain: implications for benthic diatoms and macroinvertebrate trophic structure

Riparian wetland rehabilitation and beaver re-colonization impacts on hydrological processes and water quality in a lowland agricultural catchment

Evaluating effectiveness of restoration to address current stressors to riverine fish

Upstream-downstream water quality comparisons of restored channelized streams

Primarily neutral effects of river restoration on macroinvertebrates, macrophytes, and fishes after a decade of monitoring

Coupled Hydrological/Hydraulic Modelling of River Restoration Impacts and Floodplain Hydrodynamics

Study on Application of Daphnia Magna and Submerged Vegetation to Remediation of Landscape Water

Water quality deterioration as a driver for river restoration: a review of case studies from Asia, Europe and North America

Longitudinal stream synoptic (LSS) monitoring to evaluate water quality in restored streams

Re-Meandering of Lowland Streams: Will Disobeying the Laws of Geomorphology Have Ecological Consequences?

Early assessment of effects of dam removal on abiotic fluxes of the Selune River, France

Under pressure: assessment of chemical stress on restored river sections using effect‐based methods

Persistent disconnect between flow restoration and restoration of river ecosystem functions after the removal of a large dam on the Sélune River

Continuous riverine biodiversity changes in a 10‐years‐post‐restoration‐study—Impacts and pitfalls

Dam removal effects on carbon processing in a mountainous Mediterranean stream

Can vegetation clearing operations and reprofiling of bars be considered as an ecological restoration measure? Lessons from a 10‐year vegetation monitoring program (Loire River, France)

Evaluating ecosystem functioning following river restoration: the role of hydromorphology, bacteria, and macroinvertebrates

Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout

Effects of river infrastructure, dredged material placement, and altered hydrogeomorphic processes: The stress ecology of floodplain wetlands and associated fish communities