Diagnostic Benefits and Surgical Implications of Methods for Tumor Localization in Sigmoid and Rectum Tumors

Mehmet Onur Gul,Mehmet Akcicek,Nidal Iflazoglu,Kadir Corbaci,Cuma Ali Emir,Mehmet Guzel,Cem Kaan Parsak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131363
IF: 3.6
2024-06-27
Diagnostics
Abstract:(1) Background: In our study, we aimed to determine the accuracy rates of imaging methods for sigmoid, rectosigmoid colon, and rectum cancer. (2) Methods: Patients with tumors located in the rectosigmoid colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum who were operated on were included. Upon admission, we examined the patients' first diagnostic colonoscopies and their preoperative repeat control colonoscopies and computed tomography (CT) report. (3) Results: In this study, 23 patients (57.5%) were male. The overall accuracy rates were 80.0% (32/40) in colonoscopy, 65.0% (26/40) in preoperative CT, and 87.5% (35/40) in retro CT, and the differences among the examination methods were statistically significant (p = 0.049). The sensitivity levels decreased to 50.0% for colonoscopy and preoperative CT and 75.0% for retro CT in rectosigmoid colon tumors. In rectal tumors, the sensitivity levels were 75.0% in colonoscopy, 60.0% in preoperative CT, and 80.0% in retro CT. In two patients, the tumor location was given incorrectly, and postoperative pathological evaluations indicated T3N0 tumors; the initially planned treatment was thus changed to include radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy in the postoperative period because the tumor was located in the middle rectum. (4) Conclusions: Accuracy in tumor localization in sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum tumors still needs to be improved, which could be accomplished with prospective studies. CT evaluations for cancer localization in this patient group should be re-evaluated by a radiologist.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the diagnostic benefits and surgical significance of tumor localization in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Specifically: 1. **Research Background**: The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of imaging methods (particularly colonoscopy and computed tomography, CT) used for rectal, rectosigmoid junction, and sigmoid colon cancers. 2. **Research Methods**: - The study included patients with sigmoid colon, rectosigmoid junction, and rectal tumors who underwent surgical treatment at Malati Education and Research Hospital from January 2017 to January 2024. - A retrospective analysis was conducted on the initial diagnostic colonoscopy, preoperative re-evaluation colonoscopy (if any), and preoperative CT reports of the patients. 3. **Research Results**: - A total of 40 patients were included in the study, of which 57.5% were male. - The overall accuracy of colonoscopy was 80.0%, preoperative CT was 65.0%, and postoperative CT (retro CT) was 87.5%. The differences between these methods were statistically significant (p=0.049). - For tumors at the rectosigmoid junction, the sensitivity of colonoscopy and preoperative CT dropped to 50.0%, while the sensitivity of postoperative CT was 75.0%. - For rectal tumors, the sensitivity of colonoscopy was 75.0%, preoperative CT was 60.0%, and postoperative CT was 80.0%. - The tumor location was incorrectly marked in 2 patients, and postoperative pathological assessment showed T3N0 stage tumors; thus, the originally planned chemotherapy regimen was modified to include radiotherapy. 4. **Conclusion**: - The accuracy of tumor localization in the sigmoid colon, rectosigmoid junction, and rectum still needs improvement, and further prospective studies are required to enhance it. - It is recommended that CT evaluations for cancer localization in this patient group should be re-reviewed by radiologists. In summary, this paper focuses on evaluating the accuracy of different imaging techniques (especially colonoscopy and CT) in the localization of rectal and sigmoid colon tumors, highlighting the limitations of current methods and directions for future improvement.