Inhibitory Effect of Ursodeoxycholic Acid on Clostridium difficile Germination Is Insufficient to Prevent Colitis: A Study in Hamsters and Humans
Lola-Jade Palmieri,Dominique Rainteau,Harry Sokol,Laurent Beaugerie,Marie Dior,Benoit Coffin,Lydie Humbert,Thibaut Eguether,André Bado,Sandra Hoys,Claire Janoir,Henri Duboc
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02849
IF: 5.2
2018-11-22
Frontiers in Microbiology
Abstract:<b>Introduction:</b> Bile acids (BA) influence germination and growth of <i>Clostridium difficile</i>. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a BA minor in human, used for cholestatic liver diseases, inhibits germination and growth of <i>C. difficile in vitro</i>, but was never tested <i>in vivo</i> with an infectious challenge versus control. We hypothesized that UDCA could prevent CDI. We evaluated the effects of UDCA on <i>C. difficile in vitro</i> and in hamsters, with pharmacokinetics study and with an infectious challenge. Then, we studied CDI incidence in UDCA-treated patients. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated germination and growth of <i>C. difficile</i>, with 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1% UDCA. We analyzed fecal BA of hamsters receiving antibiotics and UDCA (50 mg/kg/day), antibiotics, or UDCA alone. Then, we challenged with spores of <i>C. difficile</i> at D6 hamsters treated with UDCA (50 mg/kg/day) from D1 to D13, versus control. In human, we analyzed the database of a cohort on CDI in acute flares of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). As PSC-IBD patients were under UDCA treatment, we compared PSC-IBD patients to IBD patients without PSC. <b>Results:</b> <i>In vitro</i>, UDCA inhibited germination and growth of <i>C. difficile</i> at 0.05 and 0.1%, competing with 0.1% TCA (with 0.1%: 0.05% ± 0.05% colony forming unit versus 100% ± 0%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). In hamsters, UDCA reached high levels only when administered with antibiotics (43.5% UDCA at D5). Without antibiotics, UDCA was in small amount in feces (max. 4.28%), probably because of UDCA transformation into LCA by gut microbiota. During infectious challenge, mortality was similar in animals treated or not with UDCA (62.5%, <i>n</i> = 5/8, <i>P</i> = 0.78). UDCA percentage was high, similar and with the same kinetics in dead and surviving hamsters. However, dead hamsters had a higher ratio of primary over secondary BA compared to surviving hamsters. 9% (<i>n</i> = 41/404) of IBD patients without PSC had a CDI, versus 25% (<i>n</i> = 4/12) of PSC-IBD patients treated with UDCA. <b>Conclusion:</b> We confirmed the inhibitory effect of UDCA on growth and germination of <i>C. difficile in vitro</i>, with 0.05 or 0.1% UDCA. However, in our hamster model, UDCA was inefficient to prevent CDI, despite high levels of UDCA in feces. Patients with PSC-IBD treated with UDCA did not have less CDI than IBD patients.
microbiology