Abstract:Even once children can accurately remember their experiences, they nevertheless struggle to use those memories in flexible new ways-as in when drawing inferences. However, it remains an open question as to whether the developmental differences observed during both memory formation and inference itself represent a fundamental limitation on children's learning mechanisms, or rather their deployment of suboptimal strategy. Here, 7-9-year-old children (N = 154) and young adults (N = 130) first formed strong memories for initial (AB) associations and then engaged in one of three learning strategies as they viewed overlapping (BC) pairs. We found that being told to integrate-combine ABC during learning-both significantly improved children's ability to explicitly relate the indirectly associated A and C items during inference and protected the underlying pair memories from forgetting. However, this finding contrasted with implicit evidence for memory-to-memory connections: Adults and children both formed A-C links prior to any knowledge of an inference test-yet for children, such links were most apparent when they were told to simply encode BC, not integrate. Moreover, the accessibility of such implicit links differed between children and adults, with adults using them to make explicit inferences but children only doing so for well-established direct AB pairs. These results suggest that while a lack of integration strategy may explain a large share of the developmental differences in explicit inference, children and adults nevertheless differ in both the circumstances under which they connect interrelated memories and their ability to later leverage those links to inform flexible behaviours. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Children and adults view AB and BC pairs related through a shared item, B. This provides an opportunity for learners to connect A-C in memory. Being encouraged to integrate ABC during learning boosted performance on an explicit test of A-C connections (children and adults) and protected from forgetting (children). Children and adults differed in when implicit A-C connections were formed-occurring primarily when told to separately encode BC (children) versus integrate (adults), respectively. Adults used implicit A-C connections to facilitate explicit judgments, while children did not. Our results suggest developmental differences in the learning conditions promoting memory-to-memory connections.

Development of conditional learning abilities in children from 3 to 12 years of age

Children's Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences and Scalar Implicatures

Children's Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences

Functional learning among children, adolescents, and young adults

The neural development of conditional reasoning in children: Different mechanisms for assessing the logical validity and likelihood of conclusions

Implicit Learning and Emotional Responses in Nine-Month-old Infants

Generalization of learning from picture books to novel test conditions by 18- and 24-month-old children.

Inferring Unseen Causes: Developmental and Evolutionary Origins

Toddlers' understanding and use of verbal negation in inferential reasoning search tasks

Correlates of individual, and age-related, differences in short-term learning.

Children's reasoning about continuous causal processes: The role of verbal and non-verbal ability

The development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy

Distentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence

Learning strategy differentially impacts memory connections in children and adults

Development of statistical learning ability across modalities, domains, and languages

Holding multiple category representations: The role of age, theory of mind, and rule switching in children’s developing cross-classification abilities

Preserved category-based inferences for word learning in school-aged children with developmental language disorder

Individual differences in the acquisition of non-linguistic audio-visual associations in 5 year olds

The relationship between parental mental-state language and 2.5-year-olds' performance on a nontraditional false-belief task

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Integration of memory content in adults and children: Developmental differences in task conditions and functional consequences.