Why is the sky blue? A new question for political science

Víctor Alonso-Rocafort
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01479-5
IF: 6
2024-03-20
Sustainability Science
Abstract:The future of political science in this crucial century requires that it (i) adopt the contemporary scientific paradigm, (ii) open itself to pluri-, inter- and transdisciplinarity, and (iii) redefine the main political actor, ourselves, in light of post-anthropocentric and relational turns. A theoretical revolution to a post-normal and eco-political science is needed and, through the influence of new fields such as sustainability science, is probably already in motion. In the Anthropocene, it implies paying attention to biological links that once seemed extemporaneous. And this is when we realize that the sky has become co-vulnerable. We may actually be at risk of losing blue sky through anthropogenic actions, including global warming or solar geoengineering. Politics will be crucial in determining whether or not to preserve its blue, and everything that goes with it. The article explores, through the answer to the blue question, this new super-wicked problem to illustrate the stated objectives for political science and the need to apply them. The proposals that have emerged from this also provide a new framework for Clean Air strategies for blue skies that are being developed at international and national levels.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Theoretical Revolution in Political Science**: The paper emphasizes that political science needs to adopt contemporary scientific paradigms and open up to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research methods. Additionally, it proposes redefining the main political actors (i.e., humans themselves) in the context of post-humanism and the relational turn. 2. **Importance of Environmental Politics**: The paper explores the threats to the blue sky posed by human activities such as air pollution, global warming, and solar geoengineering. It argues that political decisions are crucial for protecting the blue sky. The author points out that as human activities impact the environment, the sky becomes fragile, and we may face the risk of losing the blue sky. 3. **Goals of Political Science**: By exploring the question "Why is the sky blue?", the paper demonstrates that political science needs to focus on biological connections and proposes new frameworks for formulating clean air strategies to protect the blue sky. This requires political science to innovate not only theoretically but also from an interdisciplinary perspective, redefining the role of humans within the Earth system. In summary, the paper aims to promote theoretical transformation in the field of political science to better adapt to the current environmental crisis and emphasizes the central role of politics in addressing these challenges.