Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
Benjamin Curtis Ramger,Kimberly Anne Bader,Samantha Pauline Davies,David Andrew Stewart,Leila Snow Ledbetter,Corey Brae Simon,Jody Ann Feld
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S216081
IF: 2.8319
2019-12-13
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Benjamin Curtis Ramger, 1 Kimberly Anne Bader, 1 Samantha Pauline Davies, 1 David Andrew Stewart, 1 Leila Snow Ledbetter, 2 Corey Brae Simon, 1 Jody Ann Feld 1 1 Physical Therapy Division, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; 2 Research and Education, Duke University Medical Center Library, Durham, NC, USA Correspondence: Jody Ann Feld Physical Therapy Division, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 104002, Durham, NC 27710, USA Tel +1 919-681-1979 Email jody.feld@dm.duke.edu Purpose: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic disorder resulting in pain and disability. An emerging treatment for CPSP is non-invasive brain stimulation including direct current stimulation [tDCS] and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]. This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and quality of non-invasive brain stimulation intervention studies for CPSP. Methods: Studies were sought from three research databases published between 2007 and 2017. Studies were included if the sole intervention was non-invasive brain stimulation and the primary outcome either clinical or experimental pain intensity. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias. Results: Of 1107 articles extracted, six met eligibility criteria. Five studies found a decrease in pain intensity (p<0.05) immediately and 3 weeks after rTMS or tDCS was delivered over the primary motor cortex. For experimental pain, one study found thermal pain thresholds improved for those receiving tDCS compared to sham (p<0.05), while another found normalization of the cold detection threshold only after rTMS (p<0.05). Qualitative assessment revealed only one study rated as "excellent/good" quality, while the other five were rated as "fair" or "poor". Conclusion: Non-invasive brain stimulation may have a therapeutic effect on pain level for individuals with CPSP, as evidenced by significant decreases in clinical and experimental pain scores. However, despite the impact of CPSP and the promise of non-invasive brain stimulation, few rigorous studies have been performed in this area. Future studies should aim to standardize treatment parameters, measure both clinical and experimental pain, and include long-term follow-up. Keywords: stroke, pain management, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation
clinical neurology