A survey of cystic fibrosis physicians' views on lung transplant referral in the era of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor

Nora Burdis,Tijana Milinic,Lauren E. Bartlett,Louisa Goss,Erin Tallarico,Abigail Boyle,Abigail Thaxton,Grant A. Turner,Luke J. Benvenuto,Albert Faro,Christopher H. Goss,Siddhartha G. Kapnadak,Kathleen J. Ramos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27273
IF: 4.0899
2024-09-19
Pediatric Pulmonology
Abstract:Rationale In 2015, a survey of cystic fibrosis (CF) physicians showed significant gaps in lung transplant (LTx) referral knowledge. Subsequently, LTx referral guidelines for people with CF were published, and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) became available for >80% of people in the United States (US). We sought to assess physicians' LTx referral knowledge and self‐reported referral practices. Methods CF center directors in the US were surveyed about LTx. Questions addressed transplant referral indications, contraindications, testing, and the impact of ETI on referral timing. Thematic analysis was used to assess responses to open‐ended questions. Results There were 110/309 (36%) responses. Respondents identified several referral indications, including rapid decline in FEV1 (93%), recurrent hemoptysis (80%), hypoxemia (79%), and pulmonary hypertension (75%). Over 70% of respondents reported using oximetry, echocardiogram, and blood gas to assess disease severity. Respondents were more likely to find early LTx discussions useful for patients not on modulators versus on modulators (87% vs. 63%, p
pediatrics,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?