Antinuclear antibodies may predict the development of immune-related adverse events in asymptomatic patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: results from a single-center cohort

Fulvia Ceccarelli,Francesco Natalucci,Licia Picciariello,Alessio Cirillo,Giulio Olivieri,Margherita Veroli,Simona Pisegna,Claudia Ciancarella,Alain Gelibter,Vincenzo Picone,Daniele Santini,Andrea Botticelli,Fabrizio Conti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01317-z
IF: 4.6
2024-04-11
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Abstract:We aim at investigating the association between subclinical autoimmunity and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a cohort of patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid metastatic cancer. In the context of an oncology/rheumatology outpatient clinic, we evaluated patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Before treatment, each patient underwent a physical evaluation and a blood sample to identify the presence of a set of autoantibodies. Indeed, all the patients were followed during treatment to identify irAEs and to assess the association with autoantibodies. Fifty-one patients (M/F 16/35; median age 70 years, IQR 16.5) were evaluated; 34.8% of patients showed ANA positivity, 6.5% ENA positivity (anti-SSA), 4.3% Ratest positivity, and 2.1% (one patient) ACPA positivity. During a median period of 21 months (IQR 38.75), 39.2% of patients developed irAEs. Musculo-skeletal manifestations, in particular arthritis, were the most frequent. We found a significant association between the positivity for ANA and the development of irAES ( p = 0.03, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.03–3.92). Furthermore, the progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients developing irAEs compared to those who are not experiencing these events ( p = 0.007). This study underlines the potential role of ANA positivity as a predictive biomarker for the development of irAEs.
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the association between sub - clinical autoimmune status and immune - related adverse events (irAEs) that occur during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Specifically, the study aims to evaluate whether antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity can be used as a biomarker to predict the development of irAEs in patients with solid metastatic cancers treated with ICIs. ### Research Background - **Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)**: In recent years, ICIs have become a major treatment method in oncology, significantly improving the prognosis of patients. - **Immune - related adverse events (irAEs)**: The use of ICIs has led to a series of immune - related side effects, which may affect any organ system, ranging from mild self - limiting diseases to severe life - threatening clinical manifestations. - **Sub - clinical autoimmunity**: This state refers to an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies are present in the blood but there are no clinical symptoms. Treatment with ICIs may trigger this sub - clinical autoimmunity, leading to the occurrence of irAEs. ### Research Objectives - **Primary objective**: To investigate the association between sub - clinical autoimmune status and the development of irAEs. - **Specific objectives**: - To evaluate the autoantibody status of patients before ICIs treatment. - To track whether patients develop irAEs during treatment. - To analyze the relationship between ANA positivity and the occurrence of irAEs. - To explore the impact of ANA positivity on progression - free survival (PFS). ### Methods - **Study design**: A single - center prospective cohort study. - **Patient selection**: Include patients with solid metastatic cancers who are receiving PD - 1 or PD - L1 inhibitor treatment. - **Baseline assessment**: Conduct physical examinations and blood sample tests before treatment, including ANA, anti - dsDNA, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti - cyclic citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and extractable nuclear antigen antibody (ENA). - **Follow - up**: Regularly follow - up patients, record the occurrence of irAEs, and evaluate PFS and overall survival (OS). ### Results - **Patient characteristics**: A total of 51 patients were included, with a median age of 70 years, 16 males and 35 females. - **Autoantibody positive rates**: - The ANA positive rate was 34.8%. - The ENA positive rate was 6.5% (all were anti - SSA antibodies). - The Ratest positive rate was 4.3%. - The ACPA positive rate was 2.1%. - **irAEs incidence**: 39.2% of patients developed irAEs during a median follow - up period of 21 months, and the most common irAEs was arthritis. - **Relationship between ANA positivity and irAEs**: - Patients with ANA positivity had a significantly higher risk of developing irAEs than those with ANA negativity (p = 0.03, relative risk RR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.03–3.92). - The PFS of patients who developed irAEs was significantly longer than that of patients who did not develop irAEs (p = 0.007). ### Discussion - **ANA positivity as a biomarker**: The study shows that ANA positivity may be a potential biomarker for predicting the occurrence of irAEs. - **irAEs and treatment efficacy**: Patients who developed irAEs had a longer PFS, suggesting that irAEs may be a sign of effective treatment. - **Study limitations**: The study sample size was small, and the heterogeneity of cancer types and stages may affect the statistical results. ### Conclusion This study emphasizes the potential role of ANA positivity in predicting the occurrence of irAEs during ICIs treatment, providing valuable clues for further research.