Exploiting treaty ambiguity: Public health exceptions in the WTO TRIPS agreement

Sojun Park,Lauren C. Konken

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09525-0

2024-01-17

The Review of International Organizations

Abstract:Treaty exceptions have long been viewed as essential to the design of international agreements. Yet, agreements also leave 'room to maneuver' through the use of constructive ambiguity, that is, by defining treaty terms with deliberately ambiguous words. When are countries more likely to exploit this treaty ambiguity? What does this exploitation look like? We argue that in democratic countries, where states face continued pressures to react to domestic needs, governments are more likely to legislate unambiguous circumstances in which they can apply international treaty exceptions. We argue this should be especially true in developing democracies facing external pressure from foreign firms and developed countries to legislate public policy with their external interests in mind. We test our theory in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement and compulsory licensing legislation for HIV/AIDS drugs between 2000 and 2012. We find that when public access to medicines for HIV/AIDS is limited but in high demand, democratic governments are more likely to legislate explicit public health protection under TRIPS exceptions, especially in developing countries with high rates of foreign patent ownership. We conclude that such exploitation is most likely when countries seek to prevent precedents by action, or adjudication, that better define constructively ambiguous treaty terms.

economics,international relations,political science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to use the ambiguity of treaties to meet domestic public policy needs, especially in the field of public health, in international treaties, particularly the Agreement on Trade - Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Specifically, the author explores how, in democratic countries, especially in developing countries, the government can clearly define through legislation under what circumstances international treaty exceptions can be applied to meet domestic needs. The paper also analyzes that when the public's demand for drugs is high and limited, democratic governments are more likely to formulate clear public health protection measures, especially in developing countries with a high foreign patent ownership. The paper further studies when this behavior of using treaty ambiguity is most likely to occur, that is, when a country attempts to avoid precedents through actions or rulings, so as to better define treaty provisions with constructive ambiguity.